[GH-ISSUE #1263] Feature Request: RMM to add disk checks for discovered drives #783

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-02 02:19:01 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:19:01 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @mearkats on GitHub (Aug 24, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/1263

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In the Automation Manager, I have a server policy which has multiple drive checks (C:, D:, E:, etc...) however they are all applied to servers but not all servers have these drives and then it creates an alert for it.

Describe the solution you'd like
It would be great to have the RMM add disk checks based on the drives discovered by the agent. This way, we won't miss any drives which are added to servers. It might be handy as well to have the RMM discover if a certain drive is a USB or not and have the option to not add a check for drives which are smaller than xGB, that way it doesn't add disk checks falsely to the agent.

Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A - No workaround other than add the disk checks manually.

Additional context
If not possible, it might be worth adding in the function that the agent ignore the disk check being applied if the drive doesn't exist.

Originally created by @mearkats on GitHub (Aug 24, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/1263 **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** In the Automation Manager, I have a server policy which has multiple drive checks (C:, D:, E:, etc...) however they are all applied to servers but not all servers have these drives and then it creates an alert for it. **Describe the solution you'd like** It would be great to have the RMM add disk checks based on the drives discovered by the agent. This way, we won't miss any drives which are added to servers. It might be handy as well to have the RMM discover if a certain drive is a USB or not and have the option to not add a check for drives which are smaller than xGB, that way it doesn't add disk checks falsely to the agent. **Describe alternatives you've considered** N/A - No workaround other than add the disk checks manually. **Additional context** If not possible, it might be worth adding in the function that the agent ignore the disk check being applied if the drive doesn't exist.

kerem added the

enhancement

label

2026-03-02 02:19:01 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:19:01 +03:00

Author

Owner

@P6g9YHK6 commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2023):

Another solution would be to have an option when setting up the check to toggle or not the error status of the check when the disk is missing.

@P6g9YHK6 commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2023): Another solution would be to have an option when setting up the check to toggle or not the error status of the check when the disk is missing.

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:19:02 +03:00

Author

Owner

@JAForster commented on GitHub (Oct 30, 2025):

I think also it would be great to have at least the option to not show an error then the disk is missing

@JAForster commented on GitHub (Oct 30, 2025): I think also it would be great to have at least the option to not show an error then the disk is missing

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-14 04:02:35 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #783] Mandatory fields missing (need at least 1 recipient) when there is indeed a recipient #2434