[GH-ISSUE #2197] [Feature Request] Webhook Alerts need to be selectable #3305

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-14 07:05:42 +03:00 by kerem · 1 comment

kerem commented

2026-03-14 07:05:42 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @joeldeteves on GitHub (Apr 8, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/2197

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Since switching over to webhook alerts, we are receiving alerts for every single check that fails, whereas with email, mobile and the dashboard, we have options to choose which alerts are fired.

Describe the solution you'd like

An option under Alert Policies to only trigger on alert severity for webhooks (same as the current options for email, text and dashboard)
An option to uncheck webhook alerts in the dashboard and Automation Policies the same as we currently can for email, text and dashboard

Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A

Additional context

Originally created by @joeldeteves on GitHub (Apr 8, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/2197 **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** Since switching over to webhook alerts, we are receiving alerts for every single check that fails, whereas with email, mobile and the dashboard, we have options to choose which alerts are fired. **Describe the solution you'd like** - An option under Alert Policies to only trigger on alert severity for webhooks (same as the current options for email, text and dashboard) - An option to uncheck webhook alerts in the dashboard and Automation Policies the same as we currently can for email, text and dashboard **Describe alternatives you've considered** N/A **Additional context** <img width="1724" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/992d4a8e-9a83-4d32-aca3-6852d1328f3d" /> <img width="476" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9063ba6b-b925-4ad1-9812-1afb822eec7a" />

kerem commented

2026-03-14 07:05:48 +03:00

Author

Owner

@P6g9YHK6 commented on GitHub (Apr 9, 2025):

use n8n for this it's way more flexible around all of this than trmm would ever be.

@P6g9YHK6 commented on GitHub (Apr 9, 2025): use n8n for this it's way more flexible around all of this than trmm would ever be.