mirror of
https://github.com/aome510/hackernews-TUI.git
synced 2026-04-26 09:25:56 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #45] The greatest TUI client so far, bat the progress [bar] is absolute must! #13
Labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hackernews-TUI#13
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @ink-splatters on GitHub (Nov 10, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/aome510/hackernews-TUI/issues/45
Hi,
thanks a lot for just the greatest HN TUI! fantastic work! The only thing is lacking and, IMHO, it's a major issue (but very easy to add): the loading progress visualisation.
Otherwise it feels like your brain is itching inside, lol :) Almost physical thing!
Or if by some reason there is one and I'm missing it... Just let me know :)
Thanks!
@aome510 commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2021):
Hi @ink-splatters, thank you for your kind words.
Regarding the loading progress visualisation, are you referring the time when loading stories, comments, etc?
Currently there is a simple loading screen (not a progress bar) for those:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/40011582/141149270-00ec8d8a-83d9-4744-be5b-22eed95dce16.mov
One reason that I don't use progress bar is because it's hard to estimate the time needed to finish an API call to the Hacker News server.
Edit: if you have any suggestions or things I can look into for reference, please let me know!
@ink-splatters commented on GitHub (Nov 11, 2021):
@aome510 thank you very much for getting back to me. It's sort of a shame I didn't notice it, maybe I need to check if I'm blue color - blind:)
but just in case if this feedback helps, you may want to make the progress bar to stand out more, e.g. by making it thicker :) just saying :)
Regarding the API call time: can't you rely on
Content-Length? or it's not guaranteed to present? (you could then update the status every time you receive a new buffer).@aome510 commented on GitHub (Nov 11, 2021):
Great! Thanks for the feedback. I'll look into those and see what I could do.