[GH-ISSUE #999] Organization import with directory connector: HTTP 404 #709

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-03 02:02:25 +03:00 by kerem · 13 comments

kerem commented 2026-03-03 02:02:25 +03:00

Owner

Copy link

Originally created by @LiaraAlis on GitHub (May 19, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/issues/999

Sync with directory connector fails with HTTP 404

When syncing an organization with the bitwarden directory connector, the called url (/api/organizations//import) returns a http 404 error.
Ticket from directory connector repository: https://github.com/bitwarden/directory-connector/issues/43

Is it possible that this feature isn't supported in bitwarden_rs?

Originally created by @LiaraAlis on GitHub (May 19, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/issues/999 # Sync with directory connector fails with HTTP 404 When syncing an organization with the bitwarden directory connector, the called url (/api/organizations/<organization-id>/import) returns a http 404 error. Ticket from directory connector repository: https://github.com/bitwarden/directory-connector/issues/43 Is it possible that this feature isn't supported in `bitwarden_rs`?

kerem closed this issue 2026-03-03 02:02:25 +03:00

kerem commented 2026-03-03 02:02:26 +03:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@dani-garcia commented on GitHub (May 19, 2020):

Yes at the moment the official connector is not supported. There's a separate LDAP service in the wiki though, if that helps.

<!-- gh-comment-id:631065896 --> @dani-garcia commented on GitHub (May 19, 2020): Yes at the moment the official connector is not supported. There's a separate LDAP service in the wiki though, if that helps.

kerem commented 2026-03-03 02:02:26 +03:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@LiaraAlis commented on GitHub (May 20, 2020):

Thanks for your answer. That is too bad. :(
The separate LDAP service seems very complicated. Not very intuitive. I don't understand how it works.

<!-- gh-comment-id:631354031 --> @LiaraAlis commented on GitHub (May 20, 2020): Thanks for your answer. That is too bad. :( The separate LDAP service seems very complicated. Not very intuitive. I don't understand how it works.

kerem commented 2026-03-03 02:02:27 +03:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@Leboubou111 commented on GitHub (Jun 9, 2020):

@dani-garcia The separate LDAP service doesn't really sync LDAP users and groups... Just invite users to create an account into your BW_RS instance.
And user cannot login with their credential LDAP account.

I'm sad that I can't authenticate my LDAP users.
Anyway, congratulations for your work ;-)

<!-- gh-comment-id:641420465 --> @Leboubou111 commented on GitHub (Jun 9, 2020): @dani-garcia The [separate LDAP service](https://github.com/ViViDboarder/bitwarden_rs_ldap) doesn't really sync LDAP users and groups... Just invite users to create an account into your BW_RS instance. And user cannot login with their credential LDAP account. I'm sad that I can't authenticate my LDAP users. Anyway, congratulations for your work ;-)

kerem commented 2026-03-03 02:02:27 +03:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@dani-garcia commented on GitHub (Jun 9, 2020):

Creating new users and using their LDAP credentials to authenticate is impossible due to the way the encryption works, so both the separate service and a possible implementation of the official LDAP connector would work the same way, which means users need to create their own accounts and passwords won't be synced, not much we can do there, I'm afraid.

Support for the official LDAP connector is included in the feature request isssue, so I'll close this to keep the issue tracker focused.

<!-- gh-comment-id:641482777 --> @dani-garcia commented on GitHub (Jun 9, 2020): Creating new users and using their LDAP credentials to authenticate is impossible due to the way the encryption works, so both the separate service and a possible implementation of the official LDAP connector would work the same way, which means users need to create their own accounts and passwords won't be synced, not much we can do there, I'm afraid. Support for the official LDAP connector is included in the feature request isssue, so I'll close this to keep the issue tracker focused.

kerem commented 2026-03-03 02:02:27 +03:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@Gheben commented on GitHub (Apr 12, 2021):

Any update about user/group sync ?
Test sync will display users and groups, but when I try to Sync, It fail.

<!-- gh-comment-id:818269868 --> @Gheben commented on GitHub (Apr 12, 2021): Any update about user/group sync ? Test sync will display users and groups, but when I try to Sync, It fail. 

kerem commented 2026-03-03 02:02:27 +03:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@Leboubou111 commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2021):

I hope every day that this function will be implemented.
But I understand, it's not easy.

<!-- gh-comment-id:818915179 --> @Leboubou111 commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2021): I hope every day that this function will be implemented. But I understand, it's not easy.

kerem commented 2026-03-03 02:02:27 +03:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2021):

There is support for the ldap connector already. Only no group support

<!-- gh-comment-id:818954501 --> @BlackDex commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2021): There is support for the ldap connector already. Only no group support

kerem commented 2026-03-03 02:02:27 +03:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@Leboubou111 commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2021):

There is support for the ldap connector already. Only no group support

For a LDAP user connexion ?
Are you sure ?

I think just for invit LDAP user by their email to create an account.
I talk about that ; https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/issues/999#issuecomment-641420465

<!-- gh-comment-id:818996317 --> @Leboubou111 commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2021): > There is support for the ldap connector already. Only no group support For a LDAP user connexion ? Are you sure ? I think just for invit LDAP user by their email to create an account. I talk about that ; https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/issues/999#issuecomment-641420465

kerem commented 2026-03-03 02:02:27 +03:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2021):

There will probably never be a single password login option via either sso or ldap since you always need a master password to decrypt the vault data.

So, using the connector would give you almost the the same kind of feeling as sso. It should disable users and create accounts for them.

Also, ldap passwords can be changed without any notification of previous password for the vault, and thus the vault can't change the master password.

<!-- gh-comment-id:819008387 --> @BlackDex commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2021): There will probably never be a single password login option via either sso or ldap since you always need a master password to decrypt the vault data. So, using the connector would give you almost the the same kind of feeling as sso. It should disable users and create accounts for them. Also, ldap passwords can be changed without any notification of previous password for the vault, and thus the vault can't change the master password.

kerem commented 2026-03-03 02:02:27 +03:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@Leboubou111 commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2021):

I believe that the original project has this function with Directory Connector sync.

<!-- gh-comment-id:819053608 --> @Leboubou111 commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2021): I believe that the original project has this function with Directory Connector sync.

kerem commented 2026-03-03 02:02:27 +03:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2021):

Well, then i would say try it out. Since there is basic support for it already. See github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs@85e3c73525

<!-- gh-comment-id:819063229 --> @BlackDex commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2021): Well, then i would say try it out. Since there is basic support for it already. See https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/commit/85e3c73525d327042c1ad142e48c044a5dbdd89c

kerem commented 2026-03-03 02:02:27 +03:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2021):

Also read the release notes here: https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/releases/tag/1.19.0

And the official docs regarding this https://bitwarden.com/help/article/directory-sync/

<!-- gh-comment-id:819064868 --> @BlackDex commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2021): Also read the release notes here: https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/releases/tag/1.19.0 And the official docs regarding this https://bitwarden.com/help/article/directory-sync/

kerem commented 2026-03-03 02:02:27 +03:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@Leboubou111 commented on GitHub (Apr 14, 2021):

I hadn't seen this update. Sorry, I'll try.

<!-- gh-comment-id:819333859 --> @Leboubou111 commented on GitHub (Apr 14, 2021): I hadn't seen this update. Sorry, I'll try.

kerem referenced this issue 2026-03-03 08:53:05 +03:00

[PR #710] [MERGED] Fixed issue #709 creating icon_cache directory. #2787

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Branch/Tag specified

Branches Tags

main

revert-7033-patch-1

cached-config-operations

test_dylint

1.35.8

1.35.7

1.35.6

1.35.5

1.35.4

1.35.3

1.35.2

1.35.1

1.35.0

1.34.3

1.34.2

1.34.1

1.34.0

1.33.2

1.33.1

1.33.0

1.32.7

1.32.6

1.32.5

1.32.4

1.32.3

1.32.2

1.32.1

1.32.0

1.31.0

1.30.5

1.30.4

1.30.3

1.30.2

1.30.1

1.30.0

1.29.2

1.29.1

1.29.0

1.28.1

1.28.0

1.27.0

1.26.0

1.25.2

1.25.1

1.25.0

1.24.0

1.23.1

1.23.0

1.22.2

1.22.1

1.22.0

1.21.0

1.20.0

1.19.0

1.18.0

1.17.0

1.16.3

1.16.2

1.16.1

1.16.0

1.15.1

1.15.0

1.14.2

1.14.1

1.14

1.13.1

1.13.0

1.12.0

1.11.0

1.10.0

1.9.1

1.9.0

1.8.0

1.7.0

1.6.1

1.6.0

1.5.0

1.4.0

1.3.0

1.2.0

1.1.0

1.0.0

0.13.0

0.12.0

0.11.0

0.10.0

0.9.0

Labels

Clear labels   

SSO

  

Third party

  

better for forum

  

bug

  

bug

  

documentation

  

duplicate

  

enhancement

  

future Vault

  

future Vault

  

future Vault

  

good first issue

  

help wanted

  

low priority

  

notes

  

pull-request

Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request

  

question

  

troubleshooting

  

wontfix

No labels

SSO

Third party

better for forum

bug

bug

documentation

duplicate

enhancement

future Vault

future Vault

future Vault

good first issue

help wanted

low priority

notes

pull-request

question

troubleshooting

wontfix

Milestone

Clear milestone

No items

No milestone

Projects

Clear projects

No items

No project

Assignees

Clear assignees

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Subscribe

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/vaultwarden#709

No description provided.