[GH-ISSUE #1268] Tactical not following permission settings. #789

Closed
opened 2026-03-02 02:19:03 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @technoicon on GitHub (Aug 30, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/1268

Server Info (please complete the following information):

  • OS: Ubuntu 20.04
  • Browser: chrome
  • RMM Version (as shown in top left of web UI): 0.14.6

Installation Method:

  • [x ] Docker

Describe the bug
APermissions don't apply to Tactical Users.
As a user with no permission to user accounts, I can still create and delete them. It doesn't seem to block sites, even though I have access.
Tried with new user, using incognito mode.

Super User can be ticked but other items can be unticket, I would have thought this would get unticked, when another tick box removes "super user" type permission.

Expected behavior
Follow permission settings.

Will update with more infomation and screenshot as I can.

Originally created by @technoicon on GitHub (Aug 30, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/1268 **Server Info (please complete the following information):** - OS: Ubuntu 20.04 - Browser: chrome - RMM Version (as shown in top left of web UI): 0.14.6 **Installation Method:** - [x ] Docker **Describe the bug** APermissions don't apply to Tactical Users. As a user with no permission to user accounts, I can still create and delete them. It doesn't seem to block sites, even though I have access. Tried with new user, using incognito mode. Super User can be ticked but other items can be unticket, I would have thought this would get unticked, when another tick box removes "super user" type permission. **Expected behavior** Follow permission settings. Will update with more infomation and screenshot as I can.
kerem closed this issue 2026-03-02 02:19:04 +03:00
Author
Owner

@technoicon commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2022):

This seems to be a problem with users created before permissions were implemented.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1231162739 --> @technoicon commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2022): This seems to be a problem with users created before permissions were implemented.
Author
Owner

@wh1te909 commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2022):

You can either recreate those users or use the django admin to edit them and remove the built in django "super user" property of them (before perms were added all users were super users)

<!-- gh-comment-id:1231172892 --> @wh1te909 commented on GitHub (Aug 30, 2022): You can either recreate those users or use the django admin to edit them and remove the built in django "super user" property of them (before perms were added all users were super users)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/tacticalrmm#789
No description provided.