[GH-ISSUE #782] Add client to allowed clients when it was created by a limited user #491

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-02 02:16:47 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:16:47 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @FrBillyD on GitHub (Nov 7, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/782

Originally assigned to: @sadnub on GitHub.

Hello, 👋

It would be interesting to automatically add the clients created in the list of authorized clients when a user has limited permissions.
I created a role with the following permissions:

List Customers
Manage Clients
List Sites
Manage Sites

This agent then has permission to create new clients but he does not see them because he does not have the right to do so. However, he does see the clients that already exist in "Allowed clients". 🙃

For now, we need to ask a user with more power to be able to add him to this role.

It would be interesting to be able to do that to delegate the creation of clients.
For example, I imagine someone who should act as a technician for a customer who does not yet exist.

I think this is achievable but we should see the impacts.

Thanks a lot for your consideration. 🥰

Originally created by @FrBillyD on GitHub (Nov 7, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/782 Originally assigned to: @sadnub on GitHub. Hello, 👋 It would be interesting to automatically add the clients created in the list of authorized clients when a user has limited permissions. I created a role with the following permissions: - List Customers - Manage Clients - List Sites - Manage Sites This agent then has permission to create new clients but he does not see them because he does not have the right to do so. However, he does see the clients that already exist in "Allowed clients". 🙃 For now, we need to ask a user with more power to be able to add him to this role. It would be interesting to be able to do that to delegate the creation of clients. For example, I imagine someone who should act as a technician for a customer who does not yet exist. ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4552702/140636850-f8ab7d36-69af-4007-8298-a4db7b65ad05.png) I think this is achievable but we should see the impacts. Thanks a lot for your consideration. 🥰

kerem

2026-03-02 02:16:47 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
enhancement

fixed
labels

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:16:48 +03:00

Author

Owner

@sadnub commented on GitHub (Nov 7, 2021):

That is a great idea! Will definitely add this since it makes sense.

@sadnub commented on GitHub (Nov 7, 2021): That is a great idea! Will definitely add this since it makes sense.

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:16:48 +03:00

Author

Owner

@sadnub commented on GitHub (Nov 7, 2021):

This has been implemented and will be in the next release!

@sadnub commented on GitHub (Nov 7, 2021): This has been implemented and will be in the next release!

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:16:48 +03:00

Author

Owner

@FrBillyD commented on GitHub (Nov 7, 2021):

Great ! 😎 I didn't think it would be implemented so quickly. 😱
Thank you very much, glad my idea makes sense. 🤗

@FrBillyD commented on GitHub (Nov 7, 2021): Great ! 😎 I didn't think it would be implemented so quickly. 😱 Thank you very much, glad my idea makes sense. 🤗

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:16:48 +03:00

Author

Owner

@wh1te909 commented on GitHub (Nov 7, 2021):

added in release 0.9.1

@wh1te909 commented on GitHub (Nov 7, 2021): added in release 0.9.1

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-14 03:12:43 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #491] sort GUI column Check Status doesn't quite work #2247