[PR #7] [MERGED] Automation and Alerts Overview #3438

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-14 07:20:02 +03:00 by kerem · 0 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-14 07:20:02 +03:00

Owner

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/pull/7
Author: @sadnub
Created: 4/6/2020
Status: ✅ Merged
Merged: 4/10/2020
Merged by: @wh1te909

Base: develop ← Head: feature-automation-alerts

📝 Commits (1)

a18863d Initial Commit

📊 Changes

40 files changed (+1122 additions, -214 deletions)

View changed files

📝 .gitignore (+2 -0)
📝 api/tacticalrmm/api/views.py (+2 -2)
➕ api/tacticalrmm/automation/__init__.py (+0 -0)
➕ api/tacticalrmm/automation/admin.py (+5 -0)
➕ api/tacticalrmm/automation/apps.py (+5 -0)
➕ api/tacticalrmm/automation/migrations/0001_initial.py (+28 -0)
➕ api/tacticalrmm/automation/migrations/__init__.py (+0 -0)
➕ api/tacticalrmm/automation/models.py (+14 -0)
➕ api/tacticalrmm/automation/serializers.py (+8 -0)
➕ api/tacticalrmm/automation/tests.py (+3 -0)
➕ api/tacticalrmm/automation/urls.py (+7 -0)
➕ api/tacticalrmm/automation/views.py (+66 -0)
➕ api/tacticalrmm/checks/migrations/0005_auto_20200406_1619.py (+45 -0)
📝 api/tacticalrmm/checks/models.py (+9 -0)
📝 api/tacticalrmm/tacticalrmm/settings.py (+1 -0)
📝 api/tacticalrmm/tacticalrmm/urls.py (+1 -0)
➕ api/tacticalrmm/winupdate/migrations/0002_auto_20200406_1619.py (+18 -0)
📝 api/tacticalrmm/winupdate/models.py (+1 -1)
➖ docker/.gitignore (+0 -1)
📝 docker/api/dockerfile (+2 -1)

...and 20 more files

📄 Description

Here is what I have so far policy based checks and alerts overview.

I am thinking of reusing the ChecksTab component for the Automation Manager UI. Currently this component and the modals are tightly coupled to the agent. I was thinking of creating a generic object that is passed with a type and perform saves/edits to the correct endpoint based on the type. Not sure yet on that still working through it

After that is working I just need to create some tasks that will check policies and run the checks on the affected endpoints.

I should have something working this month. Let me know if you need me to change anything

_{🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.}

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/pull/7 **Author:** [@sadnub](https://github.com/sadnub) **Created:** 4/6/2020 **Status:** ✅ Merged **Merged:** 4/10/2020 **Merged by:** [@wh1te909](https://github.com/wh1te909) **Base:** `develop` ← **Head:** `feature-automation-alerts` --- ### 📝 Commits (1) - [`a18863d`](https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/commit/a18863dad9d55cf84201c7b5e42ff0bcd6c4bb76) Initial Commit ### 📊 Changes **40 files changed** (+1122 additions, -214 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `.gitignore` (+2 -0) 📝 `api/tacticalrmm/api/views.py` (+2 -2) ➕ `api/tacticalrmm/automation/__init__.py` (+0 -0) ➕ `api/tacticalrmm/automation/admin.py` (+5 -0) ➕ `api/tacticalrmm/automation/apps.py` (+5 -0) ➕ `api/tacticalrmm/automation/migrations/0001_initial.py` (+28 -0) ➕ `api/tacticalrmm/automation/migrations/__init__.py` (+0 -0) ➕ `api/tacticalrmm/automation/models.py` (+14 -0) ➕ `api/tacticalrmm/automation/serializers.py` (+8 -0) ➕ `api/tacticalrmm/automation/tests.py` (+3 -0) ➕ `api/tacticalrmm/automation/urls.py` (+7 -0) ➕ `api/tacticalrmm/automation/views.py` (+66 -0) ➕ `api/tacticalrmm/checks/migrations/0005_auto_20200406_1619.py` (+45 -0) 📝 `api/tacticalrmm/checks/models.py` (+9 -0) 📝 `api/tacticalrmm/tacticalrmm/settings.py` (+1 -0) 📝 `api/tacticalrmm/tacticalrmm/urls.py` (+1 -0) ➕ `api/tacticalrmm/winupdate/migrations/0002_auto_20200406_1619.py` (+18 -0) 📝 `api/tacticalrmm/winupdate/models.py` (+1 -1) ➖ `docker/.gitignore` (+0 -1) 📝 `docker/api/dockerfile` (+2 -1) _...and 20 more files_ </details> ### 📄 Description Here is what I have so far policy based checks and alerts overview. I am thinking of reusing the ChecksTab component for the Automation Manager UI. Currently this component and the modals are tightly coupled to the agent. I was thinking of creating a generic object that is passed with a type and perform saves/edits to the correct endpoint based on the type. Not sure yet on that still working through it After that is working I just need to create some tasks that will check policies and run the checks on the affected endpoints. I should have something working this month. Let me know if you need me to change anything --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>