[GH-ISSUE #2200] Run bulk scripts and commands in sequence #3309

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-14 07:05:53 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-14 07:05:53 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @VadymKhvoinytskyi on GitHub (Apr 9, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/2200

Some scripts include http requests to external services which are subject for rate limits. Running such scripts in bulk on a lot of machines triggers mentioned above rate limits and makes script runs inconsistent

Add field "Delay between runs in seconds" to specify seconds between the script runs on different machines

Originally created by @VadymKhvoinytskyi on GitHub (Apr 9, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/2200 Some scripts include http requests to external services which are subject for rate limits. Running such scripts in bulk on a lot of machines triggers mentioned above rate limits and makes script runs inconsistent Add field "Delay between runs in seconds" to specify seconds between the script runs on different machines

kerem commented

2026-03-14 07:05:59 +03:00

Author

Owner

@silversword411 commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2025):

Put a random delay in your script.

@silversword411 commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2025): Put a random delay in your script.

kerem commented

2026-03-14 07:06:04 +03:00

Author

Owner

@VadymKhvoinytskyi commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2025):

Yeah, I did it later in script I stumbled upon this issue with. But I still needed to run script multiple times, luckily the script was idempotent, but it's not always the case.

Anyway would be cool to make it explicit and controllable.

@VadymKhvoinytskyi commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2025): Yeah, I did it later in script I stumbled upon this issue with. But I still needed to run script multiple times, luckily the script was idempotent, but it's not always the case. Anyway would be cool to make it explicit and controllable.

kerem commented

2026-03-14 07:06:09 +03:00

Author

Owner

@P6g9YHK6 commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2025):

linked with https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/2198
the current is for bulk and the other is for tasks but same thing in the end

@P6g9YHK6 commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2025): linked with https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/2198 the current is for bulk and the other is for tasks but same thing in the end