[GH-ISSUE #1859] [BUG] Remote background process cpu usage sorting not working #3104

Closed
opened 2026-03-14 06:33:42 +03:00 by kerem · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @P6g9YHK6 on GitHub (Apr 26, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/1859

Server Info (please complete the following information):

  • OS: Debian 12
  • Browser: FF
  • RMM Version (as shown in top left of web UI): 0.18.2

Installation Method:

  • Standard
  • Standard with --insecure flag at install
  • Docker

Agent Info (please complete the following information):

  • Agent version (as shown in the 'Summary' tab of the agent from web UI):v2.7.0
  • Agent OS: [e.g. Win 10 v2004, Server 2016] Windows server 2022

Describe the bug
CPU is not ordered properly when ordering from biggest to smallest and vice-versa

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Go to processes
  2. Click on cpu

Expected behavior
it should sort the cpu usage as expected

Screenshots
image

image

Originally created by @P6g9YHK6 on GitHub (Apr 26, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/1859 **Server Info (please complete the following information):** - OS: Debian 12 - Browser: FF - RMM Version (as shown in top left of web UI): 0.18.2 **Installation Method:** - [x] Standard - [ ] Standard with `--insecure` flag at install - [ ] Docker **Agent Info (please complete the following information):** - Agent version (as shown in the 'Summary' tab of the agent from web UI):v2.7.0 - Agent OS: [e.g. Win 10 v2004, Server 2016] Windows server 2022 **Describe the bug** CPU is not ordered properly when ordering from biggest to smallest and vice-versa **To Reproduce** Steps to reproduce the behavior: 1. Go to processes 2. Click on cpu **Expected behavior** it should sort the cpu usage as expected **Screenshots** ![image](https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/assets/17877371/13d0f036-5618-4fd7-9259-4620f0b1f9e7) ![image](https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/assets/17877371/620c71ec-31d1-4e19-adf5-0a1d25005bca)
kerem closed this issue 2026-03-14 06:33:47 +03:00
Author
Owner

@NiceGuyIT commented on GitHub (Apr 26, 2024):

Duplicate of #1445

<!-- gh-comment-id:2079933504 --> @NiceGuyIT commented on GitHub (Apr 26, 2024): Duplicate of #1445
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/tacticalrmm#3104
No description provided.