[GH-ISSUE #1840] Feature Request - Ability to Sort Custom Fields Alphabetically When Viewing #3088

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-14 06:31:31 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-14 06:31:31 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @davesmith87 on GitHub (Apr 16, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/1840

Describe the solution you'd like
When right clicking on a client, and choosing "edit", you can view Custom Fields for Client. This custom fields appear to be added incrementally when they were created. Add a button to "sort" these custom fields alphabetically.

Originally created by @davesmith87 on GitHub (Apr 16, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/1840 **Describe the solution you'd like** When right clicking on a client, and choosing "edit", you can view Custom Fields for Client. This custom fields appear to be added incrementally when they were created. Add a button to "sort" these custom fields alphabetically.

kerem commented

2026-03-14 06:31:37 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ZzBombardierzZ commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2024):

Bump.

Please, @wh1te909 🙏

@ZzBombardierzZ commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2024): Bump. Please, @wh1te909 🙏

kerem commented

2026-03-14 06:31:42 +03:00

Author

Owner

@P6g9YHK6 commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2024):

i think the sorting issues need to be "sorted" at every level... site, client, custom fields, agent, url action, checks, tasks, fav scripts we should be able to add "priority value" to each and have the ui sort them by smallest to biggest it's kind of a global issue

@P6g9YHK6 commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2024): i think the sorting issues need to be "sorted" at every level... site, client, custom fields, agent, url action, checks, tasks, fav scripts we should be able to add "priority value" to each and have the ui sort them by smallest to biggest it's kind of a global issue

kerem commented

2026-03-14 06:31:47 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ZzBombardierzZ commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2024):

@P6g9YHK6 definitely. I know the description mentions client but I am hopeful it would be at least all custom field views if not more

@ZzBombardierzZ commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2024): @P6g9YHK6 definitely. I know the description mentions client but I am hopeful it would be at least all custom field views if not more