[GH-ISSUE #1838] Mesh Central - Consent #3087

Closed
opened 2026-03-14 06:31:04 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @Jurgens92 on GitHub (Apr 16, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/1838

Hi,

with the new Consent feature, I would like to request a feature where you can enable or disable this feature based on Workstations/Servers

in my case, I would like to have users gain access to servers without consent feature, however connecting to workstations they need to have it enabled

thanks

Originally created by @Jurgens92 on GitHub (Apr 16, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/1838 Hi, with the new Consent feature, I would like to request a feature where you can enable or disable this feature based on Workstations/Servers in my case, I would like to have users gain access to servers without consent feature, however connecting to workstations they need to have it enabled thanks
kerem closed this issue 2026-03-14 06:31:10 +03:00
Author
Owner

@Serenfo commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2024):

Hi,

You can easily do it with two group on meshcentral one "Workstation" with consent option enable and one "Server" with no consent needed. Move device on specific group and you've your policy :)

<!-- gh-comment-id:2058514867 --> @Serenfo commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2024): Hi, You can easily do it with two group on meshcentral one "Workstation" with consent option enable and one "Server" with no consent needed. Move device on specific group and you've your policy :)
Author
Owner

@Jurgens92 commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2024):

that makes sense,
i thought it would be possible this way, with just a bit of manual moving.

thanks for the feedback.

but it would make a great feature, where this can be setup within TRMM, and not mesh.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2058521152 --> @Jurgens92 commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2024): that makes sense, i thought it would be possible this way, with just a bit of manual moving. thanks for the feedback. but it would make a great feature, where this can be setup within TRMM, and not mesh.
Author
Owner

@dinger1986 commented on GitHub (Apr 23, 2024):

duplicate of #1826 please add comments there

<!-- gh-comment-id:2072008798 --> @dinger1986 commented on GitHub (Apr 23, 2024): duplicate of #1826 please add comments there
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/tacticalrmm#3087
No description provided.