[GH-ISSUE #1754] Add copying of tasks from agents and other automation profiles to new automation profiles #3034

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-14 06:19:47 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-14 06:19:47 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @conlan0 on GitHub (Feb 8, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/1754

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Right now it seems the only way to add tasks to similar automation policies is by manually adding them to each one or duplicating the entire policy and deleting other tasks that are not needed.

Describe the solution you'd like
It would be nice to be able to either add a task created on an agent to an automation policy and/or copy tasks from one policy to another.

Describe alternatives you've considered
You can just do it manually but this can be time consuming if you have a lot of tasks/policies to add.

Originally created by @conlan0 on GitHub (Feb 8, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/1754 **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** Right now it seems the only way to add tasks to similar automation policies is by manually adding them to each one or duplicating the entire policy and deleting other tasks that are not needed. **Describe the solution you'd like** It would be nice to be able to either add a task created on an agent to an automation policy and/or copy tasks from one policy to another. **Describe alternatives you've considered** You can just do it manually but this can be time consuming if you have a lot of tasks/policies to add.

kerem commented

2026-03-14 06:19:53 +03:00

Author

Owner

@P6g9YHK6 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2024):

would be usefull for large policy management

@P6g9YHK6 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2024): would be usefull for large policy management

kerem commented

2026-03-14 06:19:58 +03:00

Author

Owner

@lizaoreo commented on GitHub (Jan 3, 2025):

Copying checks could also be useful, I assume they are probably handled and treated similarly on the backend (though maybe not?). Would definitely find both of these to be useful features.

@lizaoreo commented on GitHub (Jan 3, 2025): Copying checks could also be useful, I assume they are probably handled and treated similarly on the backend (though maybe not?). Would definitely find both of these to be useful features.

kerem commented

2026-03-14 06:20:03 +03:00

Author

Owner

@lizaoreo commented on GitHub (Feb 15, 2025):

Hey @conlan0, when will this be ready to drop in as a pull request? 😃

@lizaoreo commented on GitHub (Feb 15, 2025): Hey @conlan0, when will this be ready to drop in as a pull request? 😃

kerem commented

2026-03-14 06:20:08 +03:00

Author

Owner

@conlan0 commented on GitHub (Feb 15, 2025):

Hey @conlan0, when will this be ready to drop in as a pull request? 😃

It is mostly ready just has a few issues to fix but it will get some more work after the next big release when I can collab and should be coming then.

@conlan0 commented on GitHub (Feb 15, 2025): > Hey @conlan0, when will this be ready to drop in as a pull request? 😃 It is mostly ready just has a few issues to fix but it will get some more work after the next big release when I can collab and should be coming then.