[GH-ISSUE #1255] Users can see and assign automatisch Policies from Users/Sites/Clients they do not belong to. #2722

Open
opened 2026-03-14 05:15:47 +03:00 by kerem · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @JSuenram on GitHub (Aug 23, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/1255

I would expect that Automation-Policies are limited the same way as Policy-Overview is?
You should not be able to see Policies created from Users who belong only to specific Clients or Sites.
Also it should not be possible to assign them.
image

Originally created by @JSuenram on GitHub (Aug 23, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/1255 I would expect that Automation-Policies are limited the same way as Policy-Overview is? You should not be able to see Policies created from Users who belong only to specific Clients or Sites. Also it should not be possible to assign them. ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/68963439/186144696-776d16fb-3c05-4123-ab6b-212c6d1c5b41.png)
Author
Owner

@sadnub commented on GitHub (Aug 23, 2022):

Currently, policies don't have any owners assigned since they can be applied anywhere. The only permissions are view/edit Policies. This would take quite a bit of rework to implement, but may be possible in the future

<!-- gh-comment-id:1224572771 --> @sadnub commented on GitHub (Aug 23, 2022): Currently, policies don't have any owners assigned since they can be applied anywhere. The only permissions are view/edit Policies. This would take quite a bit of rework to implement, but may be possible in the future
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/tacticalrmm#2722
No description provided.