[GH-ISSUE #1158] Share your TRMM Benchmarks #2657

Closed
opened 2026-03-14 04:58:43 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @wh1te909 on GitHub (Jun 1, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/1158

Share your load testing benchmarks here

Originally created by @wh1te909 on GitHub (Jun 1, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/1158 Share your [load testing benchmarks](https://docs.tacticalrmm.com/tuning_for_scale/) here
kerem closed this issue 2026-03-14 04:58:48 +03:00
Author
Owner

@xrsxj commented on GitHub (Jun 1, 2022):

Requests [total, rate, throughput] 2632, 526.29, 506.34
Duration [total, attack, wait] 5.198s, 5.001s, 197.003ms
Latencies [min, mean, 50, 90, 95, 99, max] 97.18ms, 193.547ms, 189.478ms, 244.337ms, 279.647ms, 364.857ms, 433.898ms
Bytes In [total, mean] 23688, 9.00
Bytes Out [total, mean] 0, 0.00
Success [ratio] 100.00%
Status Codes [code:count] 200:2632

20 core 64 gig ram 1tb ssd (e7-8870 v4)
6 processes / 12 threads (anything above 8 processes had higher rps but bad UI performance)
790 agents

<!-- gh-comment-id:1143077818 --> @xrsxj commented on GitHub (Jun 1, 2022): Requests [total, rate, throughput] 2632, 526.29, 506.34 Duration [total, attack, wait] 5.198s, 5.001s, 197.003ms Latencies [min, mean, 50, 90, 95, 99, max] 97.18ms, 193.547ms, 189.478ms, 244.337ms, 279.647ms, 364.857ms, 433.898ms Bytes In [total, mean] 23688, 9.00 Bytes Out [total, mean] 0, 0.00 Success [ratio] 100.00% Status Codes [code:count] 200:2632 20 core 64 gig ram 1tb ssd (e7-8870 v4) 6 processes / 12 threads (anything above 8 processes had higher rps but bad UI performance) 790 agents
Author
Owner

@wh1te909 commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2022):

no longer needed, uwsgi workers auto scale now based on load as of v0.14.0

<!-- gh-comment-id:1178398409 --> @wh1te909 commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2022): no longer needed, uwsgi workers auto scale now based on load as of v0.14.0
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/tacticalrmm#2657
No description provided.