[GH-ISSUE #729] [Feature Request] SIte/Customer based secrets #2408

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-14 03:54:00 +03:00 by kerem · 1 comment

kerem commented

2026-03-14 03:54:00 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @LefflerMediaLLC on GitHub (Sep 22, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/729

I love having secrets. I would love to have site or customer based secrets though. For example I install SentinelOne and it'd be nice to have a different secret/variable to use in the script based on the site/customer that I'm running the script on.

If that's already a thing let me know. I know there's a custom field, but I'm not sure if that's safe/encrypted.

Originally created by @LefflerMediaLLC on GitHub (Sep 22, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/729 I love having secrets. I would love to have site or customer based secrets though. For example I install SentinelOne and it'd be nice to have a different secret/variable to use in the script based on the site/customer that I'm running the script on. If that's already a thing let me know. I know there's a custom field, but I'm not sure if that's safe/encrypted.

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-14 03:54:05 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-14 03:54:11 +03:00

Author

Owner

@silversword411 commented on GitHub (Sep 23, 2021):

TRMM is safe (it does have root Command and Control of all machines connected to it), and that's what custom fields is designed for.

@silversword411 commented on GitHub (Sep 23, 2021): TRMM is safe (it does have root Command and Control of all machines connected to it), and that's what custom fields is designed for.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-14 07:44:14 +03:00

[PR #2408] [CLOSED] Add application-level firewall with IP and GeoIP blocking #3888