[GH-ISSUE #719] Enhancement-Permission Manager : Limit access to certain Clients and/or sites to certain access roles #2401

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-14 03:52:41 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-14 03:52:41 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @r3die on GitHub (Sep 17, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/719

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The goal is to limit access of certain clients/sites/or individual devices to

Describe the solution you'd like
An 'Agent Access Exclusions' section/parameter in the Permissions Manager/ Edit Role window. The section would ideally allow you to include exclusions of clients, sites, and individual devices.

Additional context
Example: You want to limit access of lower tier technicians from highly sensitive endpoints

Originally created by @r3die on GitHub (Sep 17, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/719 **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** The goal is to limit access of certain clients/sites/or individual devices to **Describe the solution you'd like** An 'Agent Access Exclusions' section/parameter in the Permissions Manager/ Edit Role window. The section would ideally allow you to include exclusions of clients, sites, and individual devices. **Additional context** Example: You want to limit access of lower tier technicians from highly sensitive endpoints

kerem

2026-03-14 03:52:41 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
duplicate
label

kerem commented

2026-03-14 03:52:57 +03:00

Author

Owner

@YamacorePriv commented on GitHub (Sep 17, 2021):

Would like to see that one as of now we got a few on-site it ppl who dont have any relation to other customers and need to set up a new rmm instance for them

@YamacorePriv commented on GitHub (Sep 17, 2021): Would like to see that one as of now we got a few on-site it ppl who dont have any relation to other customers and need to set up a new rmm instance for them

kerem commented

2026-03-14 03:53:02 +03:00

Author

Owner

@silversword411 commented on GitHub (Sep 17, 2021):

This is probably a duplicate/covered by #494

@silversword411 commented on GitHub (Sep 17, 2021): This is probably a duplicate/covered by #494

kerem commented

2026-03-14 03:53:07 +03:00

Author

Owner

@wh1te909 commented on GitHub (Sep 17, 2021):

it's actively being worked on and yes there is already an issue to track this in #494

@wh1te909 commented on GitHub (Sep 17, 2021): it's actively being worked on and yes there is already an issue to track this in #494