[GH-ISSUE #508] Feature Request: SSO integrations #2260

Closed
opened 2026-03-14 03:16:06 +03:00 by kerem · 28 comments
Owner

Originally created by @AntonAndreevichMoroz on GitHub (May 13, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/508

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
this is not a problem. this is an improvement

Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to be able to configure external user authorization. Imenoo is interested in AzureAD and SSO implementation.

Originally created by @AntonAndreevichMoroz on GitHub (May 13, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/508 **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** this is not a problem. this is an improvement **Describe the solution you'd like** I would like to be able to configure external user authorization. Imenoo is interested in AzureAD and SSO implementation.
kerem 2026-03-14 03:16:06 +03:00
Author
Owner

@dinger1986 commented on GitHub (May 13, 2021):

So the feature request is to use single sign on using AzureAD?

<!-- gh-comment-id:840781456 --> @dinger1986 commented on GitHub (May 13, 2021): So the feature request is to use single sign on using AzureAD?
Author
Owner

@AntonAndreevichMoroz commented on GitHub (May 13, 2021):

Yes. Exactly. My request is about AzureAD and SSO. but I think someone will be interested in authorizing through the local Active Directory or LDAP.

<!-- gh-comment-id:840783101 --> @AntonAndreevichMoroz commented on GitHub (May 13, 2021): Yes. Exactly. My request is about AzureAD and SSO. but I think someone will be interested in authorizing through the local Active Directory or LDAP.
Author
Owner

@dinger1986 commented on GitHub (May 13, 2021):

Ok, have changed the title to reflect this, its up to the devs of course.

I for one am quite happy its not integrated, like having these things separated out.

<!-- gh-comment-id:840785543 --> @dinger1986 commented on GitHub (May 13, 2021): Ok, have changed the title to reflect this, its up to the devs of course. I for one am quite happy its not integrated, like having these things separated out.
Author
Owner

@davidrudduck commented on GitHub (May 13, 2021):

I think SAML / SSO type auth would be a great addition, providing it provides the ability to tie access control to user security groups in the SSO data source.

It makes sense to integrate authentication so we dont end up with a billionty user accounts that need to be provisioned and de-provisioned when staff start and end with our companies.

We leverage LDAP or Azure AD / SAML SSO in everything we can - providing we can still use MFA.

<!-- gh-comment-id:840885644 --> @davidrudduck commented on GitHub (May 13, 2021): I think SAML / SSO type auth would be a great addition, providing it provides the ability to tie access control to user security groups in the SSO data source. It makes sense to integrate authentication so we dont end up with a billionty user accounts that need to be provisioned and de-provisioned when staff start and end with our companies. We leverage LDAP or Azure AD / SAML SSO in everything we can - providing we can still use MFA.
Author
Owner

@subzdev commented on GitHub (May 14, 2021):

My preference would be Azure/365 before LDAP.

<!-- gh-comment-id:841012186 --> @subzdev commented on GitHub (May 14, 2021): My preference would be Azure/365 before LDAP.
Author
Owner

@FranklinClinton commented on GitHub (Dec 9, 2021):

+1 for SAML auth. SSO is a requirement for a lot of organizations.

<!-- gh-comment-id:990130136 --> @FranklinClinton commented on GitHub (Dec 9, 2021): +1 for SAML auth. SSO is a requirement for a lot of organizations.
Author
Owner

@d4-maertzdorf commented on GitHub (Dec 12, 2021):

yes please, SSO / MFA with SAML (for AzureAD)

This way you'd still be able to offer MFA, through the MS AzureAD MFA functionality.

<!-- gh-comment-id:991813403 --> @d4-maertzdorf commented on GitHub (Dec 12, 2021): yes please, SSO / MFA with SAML (for AzureAD) This way you'd still be able to offer MFA, through the MS AzureAD MFA functionality.
Author
Owner

@adamjrberry commented on GitHub (Dec 16, 2021):

+1 for LDAP/Azure AD SSO

<!-- gh-comment-id:995767444 --> @adamjrberry commented on GitHub (Dec 16, 2021): +1 for LDAP/Azure AD SSO
Author
Owner

@ranomier commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2022):

I fine with oauth/oauth2/openid or saml.
Something like basic auth or passing the login via http header would be fine aswell.

But please don't add ldap first. It's pain.
Thank you and to all have an wonderful day!

<!-- gh-comment-id:1025157103 --> @ranomier commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2022): I fine with oauth/oauth2/openid or saml. Something like basic auth or passing the login via http header would be fine aswell. But please don't add ldap first. It's pain. Thank you and to all have an wonderful day!
Author
Owner

@sama8 commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2022):

If relevant -> SAML Jackson

<!-- gh-comment-id:1041495993 --> @sama8 commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2022): If relevant -> [SAML Jackson](https://github.com/boxyhq/jackson)
Author
Owner

@JSuenram commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2022):

+1 LDAP/Active Directory

<!-- gh-comment-id:1046226505 --> @JSuenram commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2022): +1 LDAP/Active Directory
Author
Owner

@plao commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2022):

+1 LDAP/Active Directory for me too, thanks

<!-- gh-comment-id:1046260250 --> @plao commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2022): +1 LDAP/Active Directory for me too, thanks
Author
Owner

@swalker234 commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2022):

+1 to ldap or AD radius would even be fine

<!-- gh-comment-id:1092188980 --> @swalker234 commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2022): +1 to ldap or AD radius would even be fine
Author
Owner

@jbrouhard98 commented on GitHub (May 25, 2022):

+1 for LDAP/Azure AD SSO for me. I would also be keen on OAuth or custom Oauth's.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1136775882 --> @jbrouhard98 commented on GitHub (May 25, 2022): +1 for LDAP/Azure AD SSO for me. I would also be keen on OAuth or custom Oauth's.
Author
Owner

@netwalker0099 commented on GitHub (Aug 24, 2022):

+1 for SAML we use a different SSO provider

<!-- gh-comment-id:1226396011 --> @netwalker0099 commented on GitHub (Aug 24, 2022): +1 for SAML we use a different SSO provider
Author
Owner

@lateTWoIT commented on GitHub (Aug 24, 2022):

+1 for SSO of any kind

<!-- gh-comment-id:1226598924 --> @lateTWoIT commented on GitHub (Aug 24, 2022): +1 for SSO of any kind
Author
Owner

@Len-SVACS commented on GitHub (Mar 22, 2023):

+1 for SSO. Would be amazing.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1478862907 --> @Len-SVACS commented on GitHub (Mar 22, 2023): +1 for SSO. Would be amazing.
Author
Owner

@NathanTarbert commented on GitHub (Mar 23, 2023):

+1 SSO
SuperTokens wrote about a simple solution that uses OAuth 2.0 + SAML SSO that could be an easy integration if anyone wants to check it out? - https://supertokens.com/docs/thirdparty/common-customizations/saml/with-boxyhq/flow-diagram

<!-- gh-comment-id:1481511406 --> @NathanTarbert commented on GitHub (Mar 23, 2023): +1 SSO SuperTokens wrote about a simple solution that uses OAuth 2.0 + SAML SSO that could be an easy integration if anyone wants to check it out? - https://supertokens.com/docs/thirdparty/common-customizations/saml/with-boxyhq/flow-diagram
Author
Owner

@Neeeeeeeeeo commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2023):

+1 for LDAP/Azure AD SSO

<!-- gh-comment-id:1491451548 --> @Neeeeeeeeeo commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2023): +1 for LDAP/Azure AD SSO
Author
Owner

@DollarStoreCPU commented on GitHub (Jun 3, 2023):

+1 for LDAP/AzureAD/SAML (Authelia would be cool too)

<!-- gh-comment-id:1574500531 --> @DollarStoreCPU commented on GitHub (Jun 3, 2023): +1 for LDAP/AzureAD/SAML (Authelia would be cool too)
Author
Owner

@josvink66 commented on GitHub (Jun 7, 2023):

+1 for Azure AD SSO

<!-- gh-comment-id:1580016718 --> @josvink66 commented on GitHub (Jun 7, 2023): +1 for Azure AD SSO
Author
Owner

@brian-m-ward commented on GitHub (Jun 21, 2023):

+1 for LDAP/AzureAD/OAuth/SAML

<!-- gh-comment-id:1600856582 --> @brian-m-ward commented on GitHub (Jun 21, 2023): +1 for LDAP/AzureAD/OAuth/SAML
Author
Owner

@c74infrateam commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2023):

+1 for LDAP/AzureAD/OAuth/SAML - this is important for our processes

<!-- gh-comment-id:1608185399 --> @c74infrateam commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2023): +1 for LDAP/AzureAD/OAuth/SAML - this is important for our processes
Author
Owner

@Henrique-Batista commented on GitHub (Aug 13, 2023):

+1 for LDAP/AzureAD/OAuth/SAML

<!-- gh-comment-id:1676373974 --> @Henrique-Batista commented on GitHub (Aug 13, 2023): +1 for LDAP/AzureAD/OAuth/SAML
Author
Owner

@bryanliftedit commented on GitHub (Aug 25, 2023):

+1 for LDAP/AzureAD/OAuth/SAML

<!-- gh-comment-id:1693483270 --> @bryanliftedit commented on GitHub (Aug 25, 2023): +1 for LDAP/AzureAD/OAuth/SAML
Author
Owner

@bbrendon commented on GitHub (Aug 25, 2023):

@wh1te909 can we lock this issue? I think we've seen enough spammers.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1693793847 --> @bbrendon commented on GitHub (Aug 25, 2023): @wh1te909 can we lock this issue? I think we've seen enough spammers.
Author
Owner

@wh1te909 commented on GitHub (Aug 25, 2023):

@bbrendon done. yes we'll eventually implement SSO but focusing on other features atm.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1693811997 --> @wh1te909 commented on GitHub (Aug 25, 2023): @bbrendon done. yes we'll eventually implement SSO but focusing on other features atm.
Author
Owner

@wh1te909 commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2024):

SSO support has just been released in 0.20.0: https://docs.tacticalrmm.com/ee/sso/sso/

<!-- gh-comment-id:2491816105 --> @wh1te909 commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2024): SSO support has just been released in 0.20.0: https://docs.tacticalrmm.com/ee/sso/sso/
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/tacticalrmm#2260
No description provided.