[GH-ISSUE #483] Feature Request: Add automation policy to "all clients" level #2239

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-14 03:10:49 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-14 03:10:49 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @manc74 on GitHub (May 7, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/483

It would be great to be able to apply automation policies to the top level "all clients" in addition to the current client levels.

Originally created by @manc74 on GitHub (May 7, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/483 It would be great to be able to apply automation policies to the top level "all clients" in addition to the current client levels.

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-14 03:10:54 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-14 03:11:00 +03:00

Author

Owner

@wh1te909 commented on GitHub (May 7, 2021):

im assuming you mean like a global policy for all clients? you can do this already from settings > global settings then just apply the policy under the default workstation/client dropdowns

@wh1te909 commented on GitHub (May 7, 2021): im assuming you mean like a global policy for all clients? you can do this already from settings > global settings then just apply the policy under the default workstation/client dropdowns

kerem commented

2026-03-14 03:11:05 +03:00

Author

Owner

@manc74 commented on GitHub (May 7, 2021):

Aah! Ok, i assumed that was just the default policy applied to a new workstation/server when the agent is installed rather than a generic top level policy - if that's the case, great and fine to close this!

@manc74 commented on GitHub (May 7, 2021): Aah! Ok, i assumed that was just the default policy applied to a new workstation/server when the agent is installed rather than a generic top level policy - if that's the case, great and fine to close this!

kerem commented

2026-03-14 03:11:10 +03:00

Author

Owner

@manc74 commented on GitHub (May 7, 2021):

Yes, just tested - can confirm this works as I needed - thanks, i'll close this now. :)

@manc74 commented on GitHub (May 7, 2021): Yes, just tested - can confirm this works as I needed - thanks, i'll close this now. :)

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-14 07:42:53 +03:00

[PR #2239] [MERGED] scheduled reports init #3861