[GH-ISSUE #402] Feature request: Sort alpabetically both by client and their status #2191

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-14 02:56:48 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-14 02:56:48 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @frankemann on GitHub (Apr 16, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/402

Originally assigned to: @wh1te909 on GitHub.

As it is now we can get all the failed Clients first, but their order is not alphabetically.

Would be great to have all the "good" Clients aphabetically, but also the "Warning / Failed" Clients in their status order alphabetically.

F.ex
Client D (Failed - red)
Client G (Failed - red)
Client H (Failed - red)
Client C (Warning - yellow)
Client I (Warning - yellow)
Client O (Warning - yellow)
Client K
Client P
Client Z

Originally created by @frankemann on GitHub (Apr 16, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/402 Originally assigned to: @wh1te909 on GitHub. As it is now we can get all the failed Clients first, but their order is not alphabetically. Would be great to have all the "good" Clients aphabetically, but also the "Warning / Failed" Clients in their status order alphabetically. F.ex Client D (Failed - red) Client G (Failed - red) Client H (Failed - red) Client C (Warning - yellow) Client I (Warning - yellow) Client O (Warning - yellow) Client K Client P Client Z

kerem

2026-03-14 02:56:48 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
bug
label

kerem commented

2026-03-14 02:57:05 +03:00

Author

Owner

@dinger1986 commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2021):

Failed at the moment is in reverse alphabetical order.

Just so you know

@dinger1986 commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2021): Failed at the moment is in reverse alphabetical order. Just so you know

kerem commented

2026-03-14 02:57:10 +03:00

Author

Owner

@frankemann commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2021):

lol, you are right :) Actually didnt see that.. Hopefully it makes sense to have the option to not have it in reverse order at the end..

@frankemann commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2021): lol, you are right :) Actually didnt see that.. Hopefully it makes sense to have the option to not have it in reverse order at the end..

kerem commented

2026-03-14 02:57:15 +03:00

Author

Owner

@wh1te909 commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2021):

Hi just fixed it, will be in next release

@wh1te909 commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2021): Hi just fixed it, will be in next release

kerem commented

2026-03-14 02:57:20 +03:00

Author

Owner

@wh1te909 commented on GitHub (Apr 23, 2021):