[GH-ISSUE #226] allow any event log channel to be queried #140

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-02 02:13:52 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:13:52 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @bbrendon on GitHub (Jan 1, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/226

Is it possible to change the event log query to "Event log channel" and allow us to write it in?

For example a channel such as:
Microsoft-Windows-Windows Defender/Operational

The regular "System" event log is the System channel

Originally created by @bbrendon on GitHub (Jan 1, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm/issues/226 Is it possible to change the event log query to "Event log channel" and allow us to write it in? For example a channel such as: `Microsoft-Windows-Windows Defender/Operational` The regular "System" event log is the `System` channel ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6364477/103431554-93110880-4b86-11eb-9985-1571d8581f5e.png)

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-02 02:13:53 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:13:53 +03:00

Author

Owner

@dinger1986 commented on GitHub (Jan 1, 2021):

I achieved this using powershell to query the event viewer and report back

@dinger1986 commented on GitHub (Jan 1, 2021): I achieved this using powershell to query the event viewer and report back

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:13:53 +03:00

Author

Owner

@dinger1986 commented on GitHub (Feb 21, 2021):

@bbrendon is this ok to close as can be achieved via powershell

@dinger1986 commented on GitHub (Feb 21, 2021): @bbrendon is this ok to close as can be achieved via powershell

kerem commented

2026-03-02 02:13:53 +03:00

Author

Owner

@sadnub commented on GitHub (May 29, 2021):

We don't plan on adding new checks or expanding existing checks since everything can essentially be accomplished with script checks. Check examples can be created and added to community script to offload the task of creating the script. I believe there might be a few that are there.

@sadnub commented on GitHub (May 29, 2021): We don't plan on adding new checks or expanding existing checks since everything can essentially be accomplished with script checks. Check examples can be created and added to community script to offload the task of creating the script. I believe there might be a few that are there.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-02 02:23:43 +03:00

[PR #140] [MERGED] remove lets encrypt dependency #1542

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-14 02:00:36 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #95] Feature Request: Support internal CA #1993

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-14 07:23:02 +03:00

[PR #140] [MERGED] remove lets encrypt dependency #3492