mirror of
https://github.com/jberkel/sms-backup-plus.git
synced 2026-04-25 17:05:59 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #860] Incompatible API use in your codes. #682
Labels
No labels
AM+RCS
FAQ
awaiting response
backup
bespoke
bug
calendar
call log
cannot reproduce
cloudless
device-specific
documentation
dual- & multi-SIM
duplicate
feature-request
fixed in beta
good first issue
half-missing
help wanted
helpful
meta
misattribution
mms
other message sources
pull-request
question
rejuvenation
restore
schedule
security
stale
task
thanks
v1.5.1
v1.5.10
v1.5.11
v1.5.2
v1.5.3
v1.5.3
v1.5.4
v1.5.4
v1.5.5
v1.5.5
v1.5.6
v1.5.7
v1.5.8
v1.5.9
v1.6β
xoauth
~$ bounty $~
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/sms-backup-plus-jberkel#682
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @jay2013 on GitHub (Mar 30, 2018).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/jberkel/sms-backup-plus/issues/860
We notice that you use API "<android.provider.CalendarContract$Calendars: android.net.Uri CONTENT_URI>" in method "<com.zegoggles.smssync.calendar.CalendarAccessorPost40: boolean enableSync(long)>" on line 35 not exist in SDK level [9, 10 , 11, 12, 13]. This may cause problems to your APP when it was run on these platforms.
please help to check it. Thanks very much.
other similar bugs:
BUG: <android.provider.CalendarContract$Calendars: android.net.Uri CONTENT_URI> called in <com.zegoggles.smssync.calendar.CalendarAccessorPost40: java.util.Map getCalendars()> on line 72 not in [9, 10 , 11, 12, 13]
BUG: <android.provider.CalendarContract$Events: android.net.Uri CONTENT_URI> called in <com.zegoggles.smssync.calendar.CalendarAccessorPost40: boolean addEntry(long,java.util.Date,int,java.lang.String,java.lang.String)> on line 58 not in [9, 10 , 11, 12, 13]
Expected behaviour
Actual behaviour
Steps to reproduce the behaviour
Please specify the following:
@jberkel commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2018):
That's why it's called CalendarAccessorPost40, duh.
@jay2013 commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2018):
Sorry for disturbing you.