[PR #1546] [MERGED] Remove limit for single-part objects #2036

Closed
opened 2026-03-04 02:03:22 +03:00 by kerem · 0 comments
Owner

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/pull/1546
Author: @gaul
Created: 2/3/2021
Status: Merged
Merged: 2/4/2021
Merged by: @gaul

Base: masterHead: max-single-part


📝 Commits (1)

  • ebe2a20 Remove limit for single-part objects

📊 Changes

1 file changed (+1 additions, -6 deletions)

View changed files

📝 src/s3fs.cpp (+1 -6)

📄 Description

AWS enforces a 5 GB limit for single-part objects but other S3
implementations like GCS support larger objects. Fixes #1542.


🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/pull/1546 **Author:** [@gaul](https://github.com/gaul) **Created:** 2/3/2021 **Status:** ✅ Merged **Merged:** 2/4/2021 **Merged by:** [@gaul](https://github.com/gaul) **Base:** `master` ← **Head:** `max-single-part` --- ### 📝 Commits (1) - [`ebe2a20`](https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/commit/ebe2a20bce3a73c28e1325b173c23adcf7b69634) Remove limit for single-part objects ### 📊 Changes **1 file changed** (+1 additions, -6 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `src/s3fs.cpp` (+1 -6) </details> ### 📄 Description AWS enforces a 5 GB limit for single-part objects but other S3 implementations like GCS support larger objects. Fixes #1542. --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>
kerem 2026-03-04 02:03:22 +03:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/s3fs-fuse#2036
No description provided.