[GH-ISSUE #23] LLM-Driven Exploit Reproduction with Vagrant #1

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-02 04:07:45 +03:00 by kerem · 1 comment

kerem commented

2026-03-02 04:07:45 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @Cxnrvd on GitHub (Dec 6, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/gadievron/raptor/issues/23

Originally assigned to: @danielcuthbert on GitHub.

I often find vulnerable endpoints during pentests that have no public exploits. It would be extremely useful if RAPTOR’s /exploit feature could integrate with Vagrant (or similar) to spin up a safe, isolated environment for reproducing these issues.

Idea:

LLM suggests possible exploit vectors based on the endpoint or service.

RAPTOR auto-generates and launches a matching Vagrant environment.

Pentester tests the LLM’s suggestions safely inside that sandbox.

This would bridge analysis → reproducible PoC, especially for custom or undocumented vulnerabilities.

Would love to see this as an optional module or extension.

Originally created by @Cxnrvd on GitHub (Dec 6, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/gadievron/raptor/issues/23 Originally assigned to: @danielcuthbert on GitHub. I often find vulnerable endpoints during pentests that have no public exploits. It would be extremely useful if RAPTOR’s /exploit feature could integrate with Vagrant (or similar) to spin up a safe, isolated environment for reproducing these issues. Idea: LLM suggests possible exploit vectors based on the endpoint or service. RAPTOR auto-generates and launches a matching Vagrant environment. Pentester tests the LLM’s suggestions safely inside that sandbox. This would bridge analysis → reproducible PoC, especially for custom or undocumented vulnerabilities. Would love to see this as an optional module or extension.

kerem commented

2026-03-02 04:07:46 +03:00

Author

Owner

@danielcuthbert commented on GitHub (Dec 7, 2025):

I like your thinking here. Ill have a sketch as to how this flow might work but good addition.

@danielcuthbert commented on GitHub (Dec 7, 2025): I like your thinking here. Ill have a sketch as to how this flow might work but good addition.