[GH-ISSUE #98] Management while updating nodes #74

Closed
opened 2026-03-02 15:47:43 +03:00 by kerem · 6 comments
Owner

Originally created by @WaarlandIT on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/PegaProx/project-pegaprox/issues/98

Not a real issue as in a bug but more a feature request.

I have 2 nodes: 192.168.111.73 and 192.168.111.74 working as a cluster.
When PegaProx connects to 192.168.111.73 I can manage both but when I update that node and it goes offline, I can manage none.

What I did to resolve that is I have setup haproxy and added haproxy as the cluster to PegaProx.

haproxy config:

frontend ft_8006
bind *:8006
default_backend bk_8006

backend bk_8006
balance roundrobin
option tcp-check
server node1 192.168.111.73:8006 check
server node2 192.168.111.74:8006 check

Originally created by @WaarlandIT on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/PegaProx/project-pegaprox/issues/98 Not a real issue as in a bug but more a feature request. I have 2 nodes: 192.168.111.73 and 192.168.111.74 working as a cluster. When PegaProx connects to 192.168.111.73 I can manage both but when I update that node and it goes offline, I can manage none. What I did to resolve that is I have setup haproxy and added haproxy as the cluster to PegaProx. haproxy config: frontend ft_8006 bind *:8006 default_backend bk_8006 backend bk_8006 balance roundrobin option tcp-check server node1 192.168.111.73:8006 check server node2 192.168.111.74:8006 check
kerem closed this issue 2026-03-02 15:47:44 +03:00
Author
Owner

@MrMasterbay commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026):

Hi @WaarlandIT ,

there is actually already a fallback in place that triggers after I think 30 sec's of of being unreachable :).
This is because incase there is server a hickup pegaprox doesn't get blocked by any firewall.

Best regards,
Nico

<!-- gh-comment-id:3977287153 --> @MrMasterbay commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026): Hi @WaarlandIT , there is actually already a fallback in place that triggers after I think 30 sec's of of being unreachable :). This is because incase there is server a hickup pegaprox doesn't get blocked by any firewall. Best regards, Nico
Author
Owner

@WaarlandIT commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026):

Then there is an issue, I lost management of the cluster when updating and the node did not came back correctly.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3977290448 --> @WaarlandIT commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026): Then there is an issue, I lost management of the cluster when updating and the node did not came back correctly.
Author
Owner

@MrMasterbay commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026):

Hi @WaarlandIT ,

if you could send us your support bundle under support@pegaprox.com we would dig into it.
But this here "updating and the node did not came back correctly." do you mean here the proxmox node itself wasn't anymore reachable in pegaprox or in general?

Because if you mean in general then this would be thing for the proxmox support.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3977308584 --> @MrMasterbay commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026): Hi @WaarlandIT , if you could send us your support bundle under support@pegaprox.com we would dig into it. But this here "updating and the node did not came back correctly." do you mean here the proxmox node itself wasn't anymore reachable in pegaprox or in general? Because if you mean in general then this would be thing for the proxmox support.
Author
Owner

@WaarlandIT commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026):

I updated my nod 192.168.111.73 that is also the IP that I used to connect PegaProx to my cluster. That proxmox node came not back and PegaProx lost the connection to the cluster. I connected to 192.168.111.74 and that worked fine.

The failing node is not a PegProx issue, that was a hardware issue :-)

<!-- gh-comment-id:3977343987 --> @WaarlandIT commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026): I updated my nod 192.168.111.73 that is also the IP that I used to connect PegaProx to my cluster. That proxmox node came not back and PegaProx lost the connection to the cluster. I connected to 192.168.111.74 and that worked fine. The failing node is not a PegProx issue, that was a hardware issue :-)
Author
Owner

@MrMasterbay commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

Hi @WaarlandIT ,

just wanted to quick shoot a question if it's already resolved?

Best Regards,
Nico

<!-- gh-comment-id:3981101772 --> @MrMasterbay commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): Hi @WaarlandIT , just wanted to quick shoot a question if it's already resolved? Best Regards, Nico
Author
Owner

@WaarlandIT commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2026):

For me it is. thanks

<!-- gh-comment-id:3983559032 --> @WaarlandIT commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2026): For me it is. thanks
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/project-pegaprox-PegaProx#74
No description provided.