[GH-ISSUE #261] [Feature Request] Respect Image Dimensions #177

Open
opened 2026-03-02 11:47:20 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @EkanaStone on GitHub (Jun 28, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/karakeep-app/karakeep/issues/261

Feature Requested

I would really appreciate it if in masonry mode it respected the dimensions of the images.

Reasoning

I'm not sure if that's a bug on the part of the layout or intended behavior, but what I expected from it was that it would not crop any of my images. I would like my images to stay in there original dimensions (with obvious exceptions for images that are extremely long or wide). This request goes hand in hand with #260 in allowing for users to have a more image based organizational style akin to Pinterest.

Suggestion for Implementation

I think that the image width should be respected and the height can be variable. In masonry mode this would look very uniform whilst still having the 'bento box' look. A good example of this approach is Pinterest.
image

Originally created by @EkanaStone on GitHub (Jun 28, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/karakeep-app/karakeep/issues/261 ### Feature Requested I would really appreciate it if in masonry mode it respected the dimensions of the images. ### Reasoning I'm not sure if that's a bug on the part of the layout or intended behavior, but what I expected from it was that it would not crop any of my images. I would like my images to stay in there original dimensions (with obvious exceptions for images that are **_extremely_** long or wide). This request goes hand in hand with #260 in allowing for users to have a more image based organizational style akin to Pinterest. ### Suggestion for Implementation I think that the image width should be respected and the height can be variable. In masonry mode this would look very uniform whilst still having the 'bento box' look. A good example of this approach is Pinterest. ![image](https://github.com/hoarder-app/hoarder/assets/10781052/6fd87ba0-9ba6-447c-9280-4b0c345ad183)
Author
Owner

@mdsaban commented on GitHub (Jun 29, 2024):

I agree @EkanaStone with you. I'll pick this up along with #241

<!-- gh-comment-id:2198212456 --> @mdsaban commented on GitHub (Jun 29, 2024): I agree @EkanaStone with you. I'll pick this up along with #241
Author
Owner

@jannisheinzmann commented on GitHub (Oct 11, 2025):

Agreed this would work hand in hand with #2028.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3393220302 --> @jannisheinzmann commented on GitHub (Oct 11, 2025): Agreed this would work hand in hand with #2028.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/karakeep#177
No description provided.