mirror of
https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns.git
synced 2026-04-25 03:05:51 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #2412] Unexpected ADDITIONAL section for CNAME-related queries #981
Labels
No labels
blocked
breaking-change
bug
bug:critical
bug:tests
cleanup
compliance
compliance
compliance
crate:all
crate:client
crate:native-tls
crate:proto
crate:recursor
crate:resolver
crate:resolver
crate:rustls
crate:server
crate:util
dependencies
docs
duplicate
easy
easy
enhance
enhance
enhance
feature:dns-over-https
feature:dns-over-quic
feature:dns-over-tls
feature:dnsssec
feature:global_lb
feature:mdns
feature:tsig
features:edns
has workaround
ops
perf
platform:WASM
platform:android
platform:fuchsia
platform:linux
platform:macos
platform:windows
pull-request
question
test
tools
tools
trust
unclear
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hickory-dns#981
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @PRRIN on GitHub (Sep 3, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/2412
What happened:
When querying a domain name that has a CNAME record, the ADDITIONAL section incorrectly contains records that should not exist or should be in the ANSWER section.
How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):
Using the following zone file (
a.zone):and this zone config (
zone.toml):Response for querying
<d.a. A>and<d.a. CNAME>:What you expected to happen:
For query
<d.a. A>, the records in ADDITIONAL section should be in ANSWER section, as mentioned in #2099.For query
<d.a. CNAME>, there should be nothing in ADDITIONAL section.It appears that hickory-dns might not be handling CNAME-related queries correctly. RFC1034 mentions that
Environment:
v0.24.1, 6334a01@djc commented on GitHub (Sep 4, 2024):
Thanks for the report! Happy to provide guidance on how to fix/review a PR, unfortunately I likely won't have time to fix it myself (although I do offer commercial support if that would be of interest to you/your employer).