mirror of
https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns.git
synced 2026-04-24 18:55:55 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #2389] DNSSEC false positives #976
Labels
No labels
blocked
breaking-change
bug
bug:critical
bug:tests
cleanup
compliance
compliance
compliance
crate:all
crate:client
crate:native-tls
crate:proto
crate:recursor
crate:resolver
crate:resolver
crate:rustls
crate:server
crate:util
dependencies
docs
duplicate
easy
easy
enhance
enhance
enhance
feature:dns-over-https
feature:dns-over-quic
feature:dns-over-tls
feature:dnsssec
feature:global_lb
feature:mdns
feature:tsig
features:edns
has workaround
ops
perf
platform:WASM
platform:android
platform:fuchsia
platform:linux
platform:macos
platform:windows
pull-request
question
test
tools
tools
trust
unclear
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hickory-dns#976
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @japaric on GitHub (Aug 27, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/2389
Describe the bug
These are scenarios where hickory-dns sets the AD flag in the response when it ought not
To Reproduce
Send queries of the form
A $SUB.extended-dns-errors.com.to hickory where$SUBis one of theseno-dsExpected behavior
In the case of these subdomains
ds-reserved-key-algo,ds-unassigned-key-algo,no-ds, unbound responds with NOERROR and the AD flag unset. In the other cases, unbound responds with SERVFAIL.hickory should behave similarly and definitively should not set the AD flag in the response.
System:
Version:
Crate:
hickory-dnsVersion:
77bd54e2caAdditional context
Results produced using the test suite that's being added in #2385
@djc commented on GitHub (Sep 3, 2024):
Still two checkboxes left, should this be kept open for now?
@japaric commented on GitHub (Sep 3, 2024):
no, those last two were fixed in #2399 : https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/pull/2399/files#diff-59514c0e8f8e69369efb4c2ce32d3f0b9a9a5ba2db81351215b8c8971644ce56