[GH-ISSUE #1795] CAA records are Display-ed incorrectly #772

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-16 00:11:20 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-16 00:11:20 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @wuerges on GitHub (Oct 11, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/1795

Describe the bug

CAA records are not Display-ed as expected:

A true flag is shown as 1 instead of 128.
Values other than true and false are not representable.
; separator is not added in some cases.
Unknown record is not being displayed as text when/if it could.

To Reproduce

Please consider this PR to explain/fix the issue:
https://github.com/bluejekyll/trust-dns/pull/1794

Originally created by @wuerges on GitHub (Oct 11, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/1795 **Describe the bug** CAA records are not `Display`-ed as expected: - A `true` flag is shown as `1` instead of `128`. - Values other than `true` and `false` are not representable. - `;` separator is not added in some cases. - Unknown record is not being displayed as text when/if it could. **To Reproduce** Please consider this PR to explain/fix the issue: https://github.com/bluejekyll/trust-dns/pull/1794

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-16 00:11:25 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-16 00:11:31 +03:00

Author

Owner

@darnuria commented on GitHub (Oct 13, 2022):

Your PR allowed to see that RFC8659 render obsolete RFC6844. I think it will take some time to understand the changes but I am not a maintainer.

@darnuria commented on GitHub (Oct 13, 2022): Your PR allowed to see that [RFC8659](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8659) render obsolete [RFC6844](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6844). I think it will take some time to understand the changes but I am not a maintainer.

kerem commented

2026-03-16 00:11:36 +03:00

Author

Owner

@bluejekyll commented on GitHub (Nov 7, 2022):

I think this is resolve in #1798, closing. Please reopen if you think there are still open issues.

@bluejekyll commented on GitHub (Nov 7, 2022): I think this is resolve in #1798, closing. Please reopen if you think there are still open issues.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-16 02:19:14 +03:00

[PR #772] [CLOSED] Bump cfg-if from 0.1.7 to 0.1.9 #1673