mirror of
https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns.git
synced 2026-04-25 03:05:51 +03:00
[PR #2155] [CLOSED] [RFC] add a DNSSEC conformance test suite #2843
Labels
No labels
blocked
breaking-change
bug
bug:critical
bug:tests
cleanup
compliance
compliance
compliance
crate:all
crate:client
crate:native-tls
crate:proto
crate:recursor
crate:resolver
crate:resolver
crate:rustls
crate:server
crate:util
dependencies
docs
duplicate
easy
easy
enhance
enhance
enhance
feature:dns-over-https
feature:dns-over-quic
feature:dns-over-tls
feature:dnsssec
feature:global_lb
feature:mdns
feature:tsig
features:edns
has workaround
ops
perf
platform:WASM
platform:android
platform:fuchsia
platform:linux
platform:macos
platform:windows
pull-request
question
test
tools
tools
trust
unclear
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hickory-dns#2843
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
📋 Pull Request Information
Original PR: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/pull/2155
Author: @japaric
Created: 2/27/2024
Status: ❌ Closed
Base:
main← Head:ja-conformance-test-suite-rfc📝 Commits (1)
8dbed05add conformance test suite RFC📊 Changes
1 file changed (+350 additions, -0 deletions)
View changed files
➕
rfcs/0000-conformance-test-suite.md(+350 -0)📄 Description
This proposal aims to produce a high reliability and high assurance test suite that will drive the DNSSEC implementation in
hickory-dnsto completion.Rendered version of the RFC
Both the test framework and conformance test suite are already being developed out of tree. You are welcome to try them out at ferrous-systems/dnssec-tests
Note that even if the project does not have a formal RFC process, we still find it useful to use the pull request format to discuss the proposal.
RFC & implementation co-authors: @amanjeev @justahero @listochkin
🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.