mirror of
https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns.git
synced 2026-04-25 03:05:51 +03:00
[PR #1388] [MERGED] Optimize name parsing #2285
Labels
No labels
blocked
breaking-change
bug
bug:critical
bug:tests
cleanup
compliance
compliance
compliance
crate:all
crate:client
crate:native-tls
crate:proto
crate:recursor
crate:resolver
crate:resolver
crate:rustls
crate:server
crate:util
dependencies
docs
duplicate
easy
easy
enhance
enhance
enhance
feature:dns-over-https
feature:dns-over-quic
feature:dns-over-tls
feature:dnsssec
feature:global_lb
feature:mdns
feature:tsig
features:edns
has workaround
ops
perf
platform:WASM
platform:android
platform:fuchsia
platform:linux
platform:macos
platform:windows
pull-request
question
test
tools
tools
trust
unclear
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hickory-dns#2285
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
📋 Pull Request Information
Original PR: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/pull/1388
Author: @saethlin
Created: 2/24/2021
Status: ✅ Merged
Merged: 3/8/2021
Merged by: @bluejekyll
Base:
main← Head:optimize-name-parsing📝 Commits (4)
116a4a8Add a non-artificial Message parsing benchmark7b6b79aOptimize Name parsing by using a pair of TinyVec31cba74Cleanliness feedback from @djcd5d3db5Remove duplicate initialization of is_fqdn📊 Changes
8 files changed (+180 additions, -111 deletions)
View changed files
📝
Cargo.lock(+1 -0)📝
crates/client/src/rr/lower_name.rs(+1 -10)📝
crates/proto/Cargo.toml(+1 -0)📝
crates/proto/benches/lib.rs(+21 -0)📝
crates/proto/src/rr/domain/label.rs(+6 -6)📝
crates/proto/src/rr/domain/name.rs(+148 -95)📝
crates/resolver/src/error.rs(+1 -0)📝
crates/server/src/authority/error.rs(+1 -0)📄 Description
This is deliberately a draft. Looking to investigate an approach like flatvec too, but my instinct is that this approach is better (at the expense of makingWe're going with the flatvec-style approach to make better use of the expanded stack footprint.Namelarger) because it avoid allocations entirely for a lot of common domain names; 4 labels or less all 16 bytes or less.Before:
After:
🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.
NS somedomain.com.#2933