[GH-ISSUE #723] Reply-all twice and the first one dissapeared from my sent folder #455

Open
opened 2026-02-25 21:35:04 +03:00 by kerem · 11 comments
Owner

Originally created by @jasonmunro on GitHub (Jun 20, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/issues/723

Originally assigned to: @IrAlfred, @Baraka24 on GitHub.

  • reply all to a message
  • realize you forgot to say something, so hit reply all on the message page for the first reply
  • send the second one
  • the first one is now gone from my sent folder

Dovecot / Postfix / Cypht master branch on an AWS ubuntu instance

Thanks!

Originally created by @jasonmunro on GitHub (Jun 20, 2023). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/issues/723 Originally assigned to: @IrAlfred, @Baraka24 on GitHub. - reply all to a message - realize you forgot to say something, so hit reply all on the message page for the first reply - send the second one - the first one is now gone from my sent folder Dovecot / Postfix / Cypht master branch on an AWS ubuntu instance Thanks!
Author
Owner

@marclaporte commented on GitHub (Jun 20, 2023):

@josaphatim please

<!-- gh-comment-id:1598028150 --> @marclaporte commented on GitHub (Jun 20, 2023): @josaphatim please
Author
Owner

@josaphatim commented on GitHub (Jul 5, 2023):

@jasonmunro I wasn’t able to reproduce the issue.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1620887672 --> @josaphatim commented on GitHub (Jul 5, 2023): @jasonmunro I wasn’t able to reproduce the issue.
Author
Owner

@marclaporte commented on GitHub (Nov 4, 2023):

@Shadow243 Please try to reproduce.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1793566860 --> @marclaporte commented on GitHub (Nov 4, 2023): @Shadow243 Please try to reproduce.
Author
Owner

@marclaporte commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2024):

@Baraka24 please

<!-- gh-comment-id:1937059648 --> @marclaporte commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2024): @Baraka24 please
Author
Owner

@Baraka24 commented on GitHub (Mar 19, 2024):

  • reply all to a message
  • realize you forgot to say something, so hit reply all on the message page for the first reply
  • send the second one
  • the first one is now gone from my sent folder

Dovecot / Postfix / Cypht master branch on an AWS ubuntu instance

Thanks!

Hello @jasonmunro, @marclaporte I have been testing this and I realized that when using reply all to a message instead of remaining in the first thread sent message in sent folder, it creates an other independent message as well see from screenshot:
Capture d'écran 2024-03-19 112927
We have two different sent messages instead of remaining in the first one as the reply all to a message is related as well.
I would like to know if is this issue reported or not? So I may see how to fix. Thanks @jasonmunro , @marclaporte .

<!-- gh-comment-id:2006530193 --> @Baraka24 commented on GitHub (Mar 19, 2024): > * reply all to a message > * realize you forgot to say something, so hit reply all on the message page for the first reply > * send the second one > * the first one is now gone from my sent folder > > Dovecot / Postfix / Cypht master branch on an AWS ubuntu instance > > Thanks! Hello @jasonmunro, @marclaporte I have been testing this and I realized that when using **reply all to a message** instead of remaining in the first thread sent message in sent folder, it creates an other independent message as well see from screenshot: ![Capture d'écran 2024-03-19 112927](https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/assets/81784141/1376bcbb-416c-496e-a33d-37d364fab10a) We have two different sent messages instead of remaining in the first one as the **reply all to a message** is related as well. I would like to know if is this issue reported or not? So I may see how to fix. Thanks @jasonmunro , @marclaporte .
Author
Owner

@marclaporte commented on GitHub (May 6, 2024):

@Baraka24 I don't remember seeing this reported. Please address both issues with your team (please delegate as much as possible)

<!-- gh-comment-id:2096951064 --> @marclaporte commented on GitHub (May 6, 2024): @Baraka24 I don't remember seeing this reported. Please address both issues with your team (please delegate as much as possible)
Author
Owner

@Baraka24 commented on GitHub (Jul 14, 2024):

@Baraka24 I don't remember seeing this reported. Please address both issues with your team (please delegate as much as possible)

Yeah after a deep analysis we(I and @IrAlfred ) understand this:

Each thread in Cypht creates a new message...... This is redundancy....
Like in Gmail all threads on a specific conversation should be in one message for INBOX as well as for SENT folders.
Cypht creates a new message for each new thread on a specific conversation for both INBOX and SENT folders.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2227382258 --> @Baraka24 commented on GitHub (Jul 14, 2024): > @Baraka24 I don't remember seeing this reported. Please address both issues with your team (please delegate as much as possible) Yeah after a deep analysis we(I and @IrAlfred ) understand this: > Each thread in Cypht creates a new message...... This is redundancy.... Like in Gmail all threads on a **specific conversation** should be in one message for **INBOX** as well as for **SENT** folders. Cypht creates a new message for each new thread on a **specific conversation** for both INBOX and SENT **folders**.
Author
Owner

@marclaporte commented on GitHub (Jul 14, 2024):

https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/issues/10

<!-- gh-comment-id:2227382933 --> @marclaporte commented on GitHub (Jul 14, 2024): https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/issues/10
Author
Owner

@marclaporte commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2024):

@Baraka24 What is the status on the original report from @jasonmunro ?

<!-- gh-comment-id:2380403070 --> @marclaporte commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2024): @Baraka24 What is the status on the original report from @jasonmunro ?
Author
Owner

@Baraka24 commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2024):

@Baraka24 What is the status on the original report from @jasonmunro ?

I hope @jasonmunro has been expecting that the first message has gone from his sent folder as reported above because of plenty messages and could not realize that there were a thread issue. All about here, threads should be reviewed as well.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2380406898 --> @Baraka24 commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2024): > @Baraka24 What is the status on the original report from @jasonmunro ? I hope @jasonmunro has been expecting that the first message has gone from his sent folder as reported [above](https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/issues/723#issue-1764401607) because of plenty messages and could not realize that there were a thread issue. All about here, threads should be reviewed as well.
Author
Owner

@marclaporte commented on GitHub (Sep 1, 2025):

@IrAlfred Is this more data for https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/issues/1422?

<!-- gh-comment-id:3240710563 --> @marclaporte commented on GitHub (Sep 1, 2025): @IrAlfred Is this more data for https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/issues/1422?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/cypht#455
No description provided.