[GH-ISSUE #583] Add more endpoint in the configPortal to get some data. #487

New issue

Open

opened 2026-02-28 01:25:32 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-28 01:25:32 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @gemins on GitHub (Apr 7, 2018).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/tzapu/WiFiManager/issues/583

I need add one endpoint more on the configPortal, but i cant find how.
I won't change anythink in the library because y want upgrade if is a new versión with some update.

Thanks you tzapu!

Originally created by @gemins on GitHub (Apr 7, 2018). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/tzapu/WiFiManager/issues/583 I need add one endpoint more on the configPortal, but i cant find how. I won't change anythink in the library because y want upgrade if is a new versión with some update. Thanks you tzapu!

kerem commented

2026-02-28 01:25:33 +03:00

Author

Owner

@tablatronix commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2018):

There are several issues discussing this, best bet is to move webserver to public and use it directly in your code

@tablatronix commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2018): There are several issues discussing this, best bet is to move webserver to public and use it directly in your code

kerem commented

2026-02-28 01:25:33 +03:00

Author

Owner

@schweini commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2018):

I saw your gist at https://gist.github.com/tzapu/ecc0759829d30d5a6152 on how to do this, but this seems to 'only' recycling the WiFiManger's webserver after configuration has been completed?

Is there, in the development branch, a way to access the WiFIManger's webserver object, and add some .on() handlers, especially in non-blocking mode? That'd be awesome!

@schweini commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2018): I saw your gist at https://gist.github.com/tzapu/ecc0759829d30d5a6152 on how to do this, but this seems to 'only' recycling the WiFiManger's webserver after configuration has been completed? Is there, in the development branch, a way to access the WiFIManger's webserver object, and add some .on() handlers, especially in non-blocking mode? That'd be awesome!

kerem commented

2026-02-28 01:25:33 +03:00

Author

Owner

@tablatronix commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2018):

Not yet , but you can do as i mentioned above, and simply make the webserver public

#461

@tablatronix commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2018): Not yet , but you can do as i mentioned above, and simply make the webserver public #461