[GH-ISSUE #637] Connection to 185.194.141.58:80 at startup? #392

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-27 15:50:10 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:50:10 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @wikijm on GitHub (Dec 13, 2017).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/quasar/Quasar/issues/637

Every time I start a client, I've got a TCP connection on 185.194.141.58:80.

Is it possible to get an explaination about it?

Originally created by @wikijm on GitHub (Dec 13, 2017). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/quasar/Quasar/issues/637 Every time I start a client, I've got a TCP connection on 185.194.141.58:80. Is it possible to get an explaination about it?

kerem

2026-02-27 15:50:10 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
question
label

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:50:11 +03:00

Author

Owner

@abdullah2993 commented on GitHub (Dec 13, 2017):

geo location api

@abdullah2993 commented on GitHub (Dec 13, 2017): geo location api

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:50:11 +03:00

Author

Owner

@wikijm commented on GitHub (Dec 13, 2017):

Thanks for the quick answer.

I don't understand why the client do this.
Won't it be better to do that job by the server?
I'm worried about the fact that this way the GeoLoc API owner may know easily all my clients public IP adresses.

@wikijm commented on GitHub (Dec 13, 2017): Thanks for the quick answer. I don't understand why the client do this. Won't it be better to do that job by the server? I'm worried about the fact that this way the GeoLoc API owner may know easily all my clients public IP adresses.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:50:11 +03:00

Author

Owner

@MaxXor commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2017):

The initial thought I had when implementing this on the client was to reduce the load on the server.

@MaxXor commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2017): The initial thought I had when implementing this on the client was to reduce the load on the server.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:50:11 +03:00

Author

Owner

@wikijm commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2017):

Thanks for your answer and the explaination.
I'will close this issue thanks to your answers.

Have a nice day 😃

@wikijm commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2017): Thanks for your answer and the explaination. I'will close this issue thanks to your answers. Have a nice day 😃