mirror of
https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman.git
synced 2026-04-26 08:35:53 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #629] Capturing localhost:9090 ends up in an infinite loop #628
Labels
No labels
Discussion
Feature request
In Progress...
Plugins
Waiting response
Windows
Windows
bug
duplicate
enhancement
feature
good first issue
iOS
macOS 10.11
question
wontfix
✅ Done
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/Proxyman#628
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @vinitshahdeo on GitHub (Sep 23, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/issues/629
Originally assigned to: @NghiaTranUIT on GitHub.
Proxyman version:
v2.7.0macOS Version:
v10.15.5Steps to reproduce
Assuming Proxyman is listening on port
9090http://localhost:9090Expected behavior
Ideally it should capture once or it should have stopped capturing once the request has completed or aborted.
Screenshots
@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Sep 23, 2020):
Wow, it's a serious bug 😟. I'm on it now 👍
@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Sep 23, 2020):
Here is the Hotfix build: https://proxyman.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/beta/Proxyman_2.7.0_Fix_Infinite_Loop.dmg
If you access to localhost:9090 (current proxy port), it will redirect to Proxyman Local Server to prevent thhe infinite loop 🙌
@vinitshahdeo commented on GitHub (Sep 23, 2020):
@NghiaTranUIT Thanks for shipping the Hotfix build quickly. 🎉
I hope a stable release will be out soon.
@shockw4ver commented on GitHub (Sep 13, 2021):
@NghiaTranUIT Still met this in 2.32.1 from setapp...
@ansh commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2022):
This issue is still present in 3.8.0
@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (May 25, 2023):
Fixed: https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/issues/1651#issuecomment-1562489907