starred/BoostNote-App

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/BoostIO/BoostNote-App.git synced 2026-04-26 21:05:55 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #386] HTML underline doesn't work #163

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-03 00:18:56 +03:00 by kerem · 6 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-03 00:18:56 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @derekantrican on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/BoostIO/BoostNote-App/issues/386

Screenshot:

Originally created by @derekantrican on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/BoostIO/BoostNote-App/issues/386 Screenshot: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1558019/76926108-c81ec980-6898-11ea-8695-73a15f8b51b4.png)

kerem

2026-03-03 00:18:56 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
feature request 🌟
label

kerem commented

2026-03-03 00:18:57 +03:00

Author

Owner

@derekantrican commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020):

Alternatively, it would be helpful if there was a special way to underline text (similar to the markdown shortcuts like **). For instance: ==underline this== or something like that. Markdown doesn't officially support underline outside of HTML tags (to my knowledge) so this would have to be made up for Boostnote if it was to be done

@derekantrican commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020): Alternatively, it would be helpful if there was a special way to underline text (similar to the markdown shortcuts like `**`). For instance: `==underline this==` or something like that. Markdown doesn't officially support underline outside of HTML tags (to my knowledge) so this would have to be made up for Boostnote if it was to be done

kerem commented

2026-03-03 00:18:57 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Flexo013 commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020):

Supporting the HTML tags would be fine imo. Introducing a custom syntax as an addition to the Markdown syntax I'd vote against.

@Flexo013 commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020): Supporting the HTML tags would be fine imo. Introducing a custom syntax as an addition to the Markdown syntax I'd vote against.

kerem commented

2026-03-03 00:18:57 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Rokt33r commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020):

@derekantrican
have same opinion of @Flexo013 . But allowing some html tags should be useful for lots of people. I'll create another issue about it.

If you really want to introduce new syntax, it would be possible. I'm actually planning to make the app support every markdown format as long as its plugin is available. So what we need to do is creating underline plugin of remark. I could help you to do it because I'm a member of the remark project and I've been making some other plugins, including remark-math.

@Rokt33r commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020): @derekantrican have same opinion of @Flexo013 . But allowing some html tags should be useful for lots of people. I'll create another issue about it. If you really want to introduce new syntax, it would be possible. I'm actually planning to make the app support every markdown format as long as its plugin is available. So what we need to do is creating underline plugin of remark. I could help you to do it because I'm a member of the remark project and I've been making some other plugins, including remark-math.

kerem commented

2026-03-03 00:18:57 +03:00

Author

Owner

@derekantrican commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020):

Possibly. I'm fine with just HTML tags at this point. As far as I can tell, supporting HTML tags is typically part of the markdown spec: https://www.markdownguide.org/basic-syntax/#html

@derekantrican commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020): Possibly. I'm fine with just HTML tags at this point. As far as I can tell, supporting HTML tags is *typically* part of the markdown spec: https://www.markdownguide.org/basic-syntax/#html

kerem commented

2026-03-03 00:18:57 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Rokt33r commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020):

@derekantrican
Yeah, I agree with you. Could you leave some reaction to #389 ?

@Rokt33r commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020): @derekantrican Yeah, I agree with you. Could you leave some reaction to #389 ?

kerem commented

2026-03-03 00:18:58 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Rokt33r commented on GitHub (Apr 5, 2020):

Closed because https://github.com/BoostIO/BoostNote.next/issues/389 covers this. @derekantrican Please follow #389!

@Rokt33r commented on GitHub (Apr 5, 2020): Closed because https://github.com/BoostIO/BoostNote.next/issues/389 covers this. @derekantrican Please follow #389!

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-03 00:22:27 +03:00

[PR #163] [MERGED] fixed bug causing memory issues #625

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/BoostNote-App#163

No description provided.

Rows
Columns