starred/zmbackup

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/lucascbeyeler/zmbackup.git synced 2026-04-24 22:55:56 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #41] I can't run backups | DNS SRV: out of memory? #26

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-27 08:13:55 +03:00 by kerem · 6 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:13:55 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @zenatuz on GitHub (May 21, 2017).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/lucascbeyeler/zmbackup/issues/41

Originally assigned to: @lucascbeyeler on GitHub.

Hey Lucas,

I'm trying do a backup, but when I run the command, I have this issue, DNS SRV: out of memory?.

[zimbra@webmail ~]$ zmbackup -f user@domain
Running the Full Backup - Please wait...
DNS SRV: out of memory?
Backup finished!
[zimbra@webmail ~]$ zmbackup -v
zmbackup version: 1.1.4

How can I fix it? Do I need to do any different configuration when I run the wizard?

P.S.: I did the installation process without change any option.

Thanks.

Originally created by @zenatuz on GitHub (May 21, 2017). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/lucascbeyeler/zmbackup/issues/41 Originally assigned to: @lucascbeyeler on GitHub. Hey Lucas, I'm trying do a backup, but when I run the command, I have this issue, `DNS SRV: out of memory?`. ``` [zimbra@webmail ~]$ zmbackup -f user@domain Running the Full Backup - Please wait... DNS SRV: out of memory? Backup finished! [zimbra@webmail ~]$ zmbackup -v zmbackup version: 1.1.4 ``` How can I fix it? Do I need to do any different configuration when I run the wizard? P.S.: I did the installation process without change any option. Thanks.

kerem

2026-02-27 08:13:55 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
Bug Report

Enhancement
labels

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:13:56 +03:00

Author

Owner

@lucascbeyeler commented on GitHub (May 21, 2017):

Good evening @zenatuz ,

The problem probably is the multithread feature. For default, the zmbackup work with 3 threads at the same time, but it's looks like your server don't work very well with this amount. Can you please open the file /etc/zmbackup/zmbackup.conf and change the MAX_PARALLEL_PROCESS option from 3 to 1 and try again?

Regards,
Lucas Costa Beyeler

@lucascbeyeler commented on GitHub (May 21, 2017): Good evening @zenatuz , The problem probably is the multithread feature. For default, the zmbackup work with 3 threads at the same time, but it's looks like your server don't work very well with this amount. Can you please open the file /etc/zmbackup/zmbackup.conf and change the MAX_PARALLEL_PROCESS option from 3 to 1 and try again? Regards, Lucas Costa Beyeler

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:13:56 +03:00

Author

Owner

@zenatuz commented on GitHub (May 23, 2017):

Hey @lucascbeyeler,

I've found the solution, I needed to change the value of a few variables in the zmbackup.conf, puting the server IP address.
I've found the solution in this post: https://github.com/bggo/Zmbkpose/issues/43

Thanks anyway.

@zenatuz commented on GitHub (May 23, 2017): Hey @lucascbeyeler, I've found the solution, I needed to change the value of a few variables in the zmbackup.conf, puting the server IP address. I've found the solution in this post: https://github.com/bggo/Zmbkpose/issues/43 Thanks anyway.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:13:56 +03:00

Author

Owner

@lucascbeyeler commented on GitHub (May 23, 2017):

Good morning @zenatuz ,

Strange that you need to change this value in your conf, because the zmbackup_wizard should provide the correct value. Does the field was empty?

Question: do you put the IP address of your server inside the /etc/hosts?

I'm marking this as bug related to zmbackup_wizard for now.

Regards,
Lucas Costa Beyeler

@lucascbeyeler commented on GitHub (May 23, 2017): Good morning @zenatuz , Strange that you need to change this value in your conf, because the zmbackup_wizard should provide the correct value. Does the field was empty? Question: do you put the IP address of your server inside the /etc/hosts? I'm marking this as bug related to zmbackup_wizard for now. Regards, Lucas Costa Beyeler

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:13:56 +03:00

Author

Owner

@zenatuz commented on GitHub (May 23, 2017):

Hey @lucascbeyeler, good afternoon.

No, the fields wasn't empty, but they had a variable, I don't remember wich were.
I'm not sure about the /etc/hosts, maybe this was the source of the problem. I'll check later and let you know about this setting.

Thanks for the feedback.

Renato Batista.

@zenatuz commented on GitHub (May 23, 2017): Hey @lucascbeyeler, good afternoon. No, the fields wasn't empty, but they had a variable, I don't remember wich were. I'm not sure about the /etc/hosts, maybe this was the source of the problem. I'll check later and let you know about this setting. Thanks for the feedback. Renato Batista.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:13:56 +03:00

Author

Owner

@zenatuz commented on GitHub (May 24, 2017):

Hey @lucascbeyeler,

Settings were ok on /etc/hosts.
I don't know what happened during the installation. Hehe.

Regards.

#update
I've checked the /etc/hosts, all settings were ok. All IP/names were in the file.

@zenatuz commented on GitHub (May 24, 2017): Hey @lucascbeyeler, Settings were ok on /etc/hosts. I don't know what happened during the installation. Hehe. Regards. #update I've checked the /etc/hosts, all settings were ok. All IP/names were in the file.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 08:13:56 +03:00

Author

Owner

@lucascbeyeler commented on GitHub (Jul 16, 2017):

Closing this issue because this bug was fixed in branch DEV

@lucascbeyeler commented on GitHub (Jul 16, 2017): Closing this issue because this bug was fixed in branch DEV

kerem referenced this issue

2026-02-27 08:14:43 +03:00

[PR #30] [MERGED] Release 1.1.0 #169