htmlfile.html #20

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-03 11:13:25 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-03 11:13:25 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @andiohn on GitHub (Jul 19, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/debloper/xiosk/issues/22

Just thought I'd highlight that you can run local content.

Originally created by @andiohn on GitHub (Jul 19, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/debloper/xiosk/issues/22 Just thought I'd highlight that you can run local content.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-03 11:13:25 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #20] Modify the how to to add hostname change. I borked my install by changing the hostname after the script ran #21

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-03 11:13:25 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-03 11:13:26 +03:00

Author

Owner

@debloper commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2024):

Yeah, absolutely... any URL that you can open in browser should work.

How about we add it as an example URL to the sample config file which loads up on first setup, to give users a hint that they can use local file:// protocol or localhost:port server etc?

@debloper commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2024): Yeah, absolutely... any URL that you can open in browser should work. How about we add it as an example URL to the sample config file which loads up on first setup, to give users a hint that they can use local `file://` protocol or `localhost:port` server etc?

kerem commented

2026-03-03 11:13:26 +03:00

Author

Owner

@andiohn commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2024):

Absolutely! That would exactly work it.

I'll share a time and weather locally run website that you can use!

-John

---- On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 16:42:55 -0600 @.*** wrote ----

Yeah, absolutely... any URL that you can open in browser should work.

How about we add it as an example URL to the sample config file which loads up on first setup, to give users a hint that they can use local file:// protocol or localhost:port server etc?

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.

@andiohn commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2024): Absolutely! That would exactly work it. I'll share a time and weather locally run website that you can use! -John ---- On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 16:42:55 -0600 ***@***.*** wrote ---- Yeah, absolutely... any URL that you can open in browser should work. How about we add it as an example URL to the sample config file which loads up on first setup, to give users a hint that they can use local file:// protocol or localhost:port server etc? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.