mirror of
https://github.com/oerg866/win98-quickinstall.git
synced 2026-04-25 21:15:52 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #70] Feature Request: ACPI or APM Mode #61
Labels
No labels
bug
documentation
enhancement
help wanted
pull-request
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/win98-quickinstall#61
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @dribgnikcom on GitHub (Feb 15, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/oerg866/win98-quickinstall/issues/70
Currently, the installer always uses APM mode. Sometimes, ACPI is necessary or else there aren't enough IRQs in Windows.
What is chiefly needed is the ability to select which mode is desired before installation.
Thanks
@oerg866 commented on GitHub (Feb 15, 2026):
Extremely difficult to implement at this time, but who knows what the future holds
@LordOfMice commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2026):
There is just two Registry options exist for forced switching between NoPnP, PnP BIOS and ACPI in hardware detection. And, yes, APM is just sideband option for the two first of them and does not have any relation to "enough IRQ" theme, of course.
@dribgnikcom commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2026):
Why?
With regular setup.exe this is accomplished by running:
setup c:\win98\apminst.infContents of apminst.inf:
This comes from "IBM ThinkPad Windows 98/98SE Supplement File IV" dated August 11, 2000.
@oerg866 commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2026):
Sometime later this year I will put up a code bounty for making a C library that can read/write win9x format registry files, so that I can make stuff like this in the installer, but before that, this won't happen
@mskrzynski commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2026):
Brief internet search sent me to this old russian program claiming to be able to edit win9x registry from dos, don't know if it has ability to import and execute reg files/make changes from command line so this can be inserted into autoexec.bat for example:
https://web.archive.org/web/20041205151927/http://paullee.ru/regstry.html
@oerg866 commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2026):
That would be useful, if QuickInstall was DOS based :) I will not implement
AUTOEXEC editing in the installer, it is too messy
On Mon, 16 Feb 2026 at 22:47, Michał Skrzyński @.***>
wrote:
@mskrzynski commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2026):
Can always rev-eng this program, just throwing some bones to you/someone else who want to tackle this issue.
@ages2001 commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026):
Hi, @dribgnikcom ! I'm planning to implement it on my installer next release. I'll inform you (not a promise for full stable yet) when it's ready if you want.
@oerg866 commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026):
@ages2001 but your installer is for NT-based systems right?
@ages2001 commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026):
For now, yes. But in future, it'll support all DOS-based OSes too.
@oerg866 commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026):
so you're trying to steal my users? ;)
@ages2001 commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026):
depends on how you look at the event
@oerg866 commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026):
any particular reason or you just wanna try making the same thing? 😛
@ages2001 commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026):
I wouldn't say "same things" but more.
And this shouldn't be concerned you :)
@oerg866 commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026):
out of curiosity, what features are you thinking about that i may be missing?
@ages2001 commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026):
Nice try but it won't work :)
@oerg866 commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026):
Oh, I remember you now from your Discord DMs
That's funny, first you add me on Discord, notice a flag in my bio, send hateful DMs...
Then you steal my idea and concept - but at least it was NT based OSs which was pretty cool
Now you want to copy my actual project and try to advertise and get attention in my comments section, and then you suddenly become secretive when asked about it
That's very "open source" spirited of you :)
But very expected based on your contact earlier, actually
@ages2001 commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026):
You're very good at manipulating and being liar. That is not just a 'flag', you're supporting terrorism. If you'll continue like this, I won't hesitate to publish that DMs you're talking about.
And for 'stealing' according to you; I have bad news for you. You can search about what really 'open source' is. And when helping an user became getting attention?
Too bad that you can't even tolerate others helping your own users.
@oerg866 commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2026):
I mean, you have the right to clone the project and do all of that, but I also have the right to call out the hypocrisy and to say that poaching users based on features that your project doesn't even have yet is kind of a dick move
Sidenote: it is a bit ironic that an Islamist accuses others of supporting terrorism, lol
Locking this because it's not helpful to anyone here