[PR #657] Don't add port 22 to default #702

New issue

Open

opened 2026-02-27 16:40:13 +03:00 by kerem · 0 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-27 16:40:13 +03:00

Owner

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/retspen/webvirtmgr/pull/657
Author: @coryschwartz
Created: 2/3/2018
Status: 🔄 Open

Base: master ← Head: cschwartz/default-port

📝 Commits (1)

e8c9e96 Don't add port 22 to default

📊 Changes

1 file changed (+1 additions, -1 deletions)

View changed files

📝 console/webvirtmgr-console (+1 -1)

📄 Description

Specifying the port seems unnecessary since the ssh commandline
tool will use the correct port if specified. Specifying it here
can also cause problems if the host is an SSH alias where the port
is already defined.

I'm using webvirtmgr this way to manage hypervisors accessed through
an SSH tunnel.

_{🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.}

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/retspen/webvirtmgr/pull/657 **Author:** [@coryschwartz](https://github.com/coryschwartz) **Created:** 2/3/2018 **Status:** 🔄 Open **Base:** `master` ← **Head:** `cschwartz/default-port` --- ### 📝 Commits (1) - [`e8c9e96`](https://github.com/retspen/webvirtmgr/commit/e8c9e96a8dbf5e6977907c9db239473be302322c) Don't add port 22 to default ### 📊 Changes **1 file changed** (+1 additions, -1 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `console/webvirtmgr-console` (+1 -1) </details> ### 📄 Description Specifying the port seems unnecessary since the ssh commandline tool will use the correct port if specified. Specifying it here can also cause problems if the host is an SSH alias where the port is already defined. I'm using webvirtmgr this way to manage hypervisors accessed through an SSH tunnel. --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>