[GH-ISSUE #57] What about IPv6 support? #47

Closed
opened 2026-02-27 16:00:50 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments
Owner

Originally created by @ncyclon on GitHub (May 22, 2013).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/retspen/webvirtmgr/issues/57

How about IPv6 support in webvirtmgr? :-)

Originally created by @ncyclon on GitHub (May 22, 2013). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/retspen/webvirtmgr/issues/57 How about IPv6 support in webvirtmgr? :-)
kerem closed this issue 2026-02-27 16:00:50 +03:00
Author
Owner

@retspen commented on GitHub (May 22, 2013):

If you use bridge not a problem. NAT, ROUTE, ISOLATE not yet supported. This is interested if you use ROUTE network for IPV6, example - https://github.com/retspen/webvirtmgr/issues/46#issuecomment-18205730

<!-- gh-comment-id:18260059 --> @retspen commented on GitHub (May 22, 2013): If you use bridge not a problem. NAT, ROUTE, ISOLATE not yet supported. This is interested if you use ROUTE network for IPV6, example - https://github.com/retspen/webvirtmgr/issues/46#issuecomment-18205730
Author
Owner

@ncyclon commented on GitHub (May 22, 2013):

NAT, ROUTE, ISOLATE not yet supported

Will be great, If it will be supported.

<!-- gh-comment-id:18260673 --> @ncyclon commented on GitHub (May 22, 2013): > NAT, ROUTE, ISOLATE not yet supported Will be great, If it will be supported.
Author
Owner

@retspen commented on GitHub (May 22, 2013):

Well means I'll work something out

<!-- gh-comment-id:18260744 --> @retspen commented on GitHub (May 22, 2013): Well means I'll work something out
Author
Owner

@retspen commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2014):

Move to #197

<!-- gh-comment-id:33776147 --> @retspen commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2014): Move to #197
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/webvirtmgr#47
No description provided.