[GH-ISSUE #459] Host noVNC over the same port as django interface port. #341

Open
opened 2026-02-27 16:38:56 +03:00 by kerem · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @crocket on GitHub (Oct 14, 2014).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/retspen/webvirtmgr/issues/459

If I launch noVNC from a remote machine but have no access to the port 6080, I can't use noVNC.

Isn't it possible to have the django web interface port serve as a websocket port, too?

In my company, an HTTP/HTTPS apache httpd reverse proxy is in front of every web service, so it's beneficial to use only one port for django web interface and websocket.

Originally created by @crocket on GitHub (Oct 14, 2014). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/retspen/webvirtmgr/issues/459 If I launch noVNC from a remote machine but have no access to the port 6080, I can't use noVNC. Isn't it possible to have the django web interface port serve as a websocket port, too? In my company, an HTTP/HTTPS apache httpd reverse proxy is in front of every web service, so it's beneficial to use only one port for django web interface and websocket.
Author
Owner

@crocket commented on GitHub (Oct 14, 2014):

https://github.com/jrief/django-websocket-redis could help.

<!-- gh-comment-id:59049781 --> @crocket commented on GitHub (Oct 14, 2014): https://github.com/jrief/django-websocket-redis could help.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/webvirtmgr#341
No description provided.