[GH-ISSUE #93] Storage hierarchy (path of system) #64

New issue

Open

opened 2026-02-27 15:57:11 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:57:11 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @andrem on GitHub (Mar 17, 2016).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/retspen/webvirtcloud/issues/93

Hi,

In my scenario, my storage server is NFS server but the path It has hierarchical names. In this case, I need change urls.py for to list storage path in compute node.

Please, check this commit:

github.com/andrem/webvirtcloud@84fe28e9d7

Thanks.

Originally created by @andrem on GitHub (Mar 17, 2016). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/retspen/webvirtcloud/issues/93 Hi, In my scenario, my storage server is NFS server but the path It has hierarchical names. In this case, I need change urls.py for to list storage path in compute node. Please, check this commit: https://github.com/andrem/webvirtcloud/commit/84fe28e9d7998ababa1127321266ae10cbfcdbad Thanks.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:57:12 +03:00

Author

Owner

@retspen commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2016):

Hm... But you can create pull-request I will approve it.

@retspen commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2016): Hm... But you can create pull-request I will approve it.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:57:12 +03:00

Author

Owner

@andrem commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2016):

Done! Thanks.

I'm changing a bit the panel to place availability zones. Has something thinking about it already?

@andrem commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2016): Done! Thanks. I'm changing a bit the panel to place availability zones. Has something thinking about it already?

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:57:12 +03:00

Author

Owner

@retspen commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2016):

I think WebVirtMgr is simple panel for working admins and users.

@retspen commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2016): I think WebVirtMgr is simple panel for working admins and users.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:57:12 +03:00

Author

Owner

@andrem commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2016):

I understand. I'm thinking of just having a field for informing compute a description. Just this. I'm working on it now, I made the migration and am changing the compute register. I will send you something from my tree to look after.

Thanks.

@andrem commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2016): I understand. I'm thinking of just having a field for informing compute a description. Just this. I'm working on it now, I made the migration and am changing the compute register. I will send you something from my tree to look after. Thanks.