[GH-ISSUE #551] Format code with black? #328

Open
opened 2026-02-27 15:58:16 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @t-tran on GitHub (Oct 29, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/retspen/webvirtcloud/issues/551

Even django is now using black to format their code base. Should we do that too please?

Originally created by @t-tran on GitHub (Oct 29, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/retspen/webvirtcloud/issues/551 Even django is now using `black` to format their code base. Should we do that too please?
Author
Owner

@catborise commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2022):

partially i used black formatter. but we should.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1298543863 --> @catborise commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2022): partially i used black formatter. but we should.
Author
Owner

@t-tran commented on GitHub (Nov 13, 2022):

Hi @catborise, I see a lot of code has been formatted in https://github.com/retspen/webvirtcloud/pull/552
May I know which profile/config of black was used so I can add a linter/formatter in github actions?

<!-- gh-comment-id:1312633789 --> @t-tran commented on GitHub (Nov 13, 2022): Hi @catborise, I see a lot of code has been formatted in https://github.com/retspen/webvirtcloud/pull/552 May I know which profile/config of `black` was used so I can add a linter/formatter in github actions?
Author
Owner

@catborise commented on GitHub (Nov 13, 2022):

I do not know very well black formatter. I used default black config. We are using super linter for github actions. It checks all type of codes…

<!-- gh-comment-id:1312654948 --> @catborise commented on GitHub (Nov 13, 2022): I do not know very well black formatter. I used default black config. We are using super linter for github actions. It checks all type of codes…
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/webvirtcloud#328
No description provided.