starred/wastebin-matze

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/matze/wastebin.git synced 2026-04-25 16:45:59 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #82] Docker container healthcheck #52

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-27 10:15:31 +03:00 by kerem · 5 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-27 10:15:31 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @ilgigante77 on GitHub (Nov 28, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/matze/wastebin/issues/82

Is there a way to get a docker healthckeck via some internal command?

Originally created by @ilgigante77 on GitHub (Nov 28, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/matze/wastebin/issues/82 Is there a way to get a docker healthckeck via some internal command?

kerem closed this issue

2026-02-27 10:15:31 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-02-27 10:15:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@matze commented on GitHub (Jan 14, 2025):

What exactly do you mean? If the service is still up and running? I'd say GET / and you are golden.

@matze commented on GitHub (Jan 14, 2025): What exactly do you mean? If the service is still up and running? I'd say `GET /` and you are golden.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 10:15:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ilgigante77 commented on GitHub (Jan 19, 2025):

this;

healthcheck:
test: "wget --no-verbose --tries=1 --spider http://127.0.0.1:xxxx || exit 1"
interval: 1m30s
timeout: 10s
retries: 3
start_period: 5s

or implementing this in Dockerfile:

HEALTHCHECK [OPTIONS] CMD

or implementing the /health endpoint...

its the container that checks itself internally, not an external call.

@ilgigante77 commented on GitHub (Jan 19, 2025): this; healthcheck: test: "wget --no-verbose --tries=1 --spider http://127.0.0.1:xxxx || exit 1" interval: 1m30s timeout: 10s retries: 3 start_period: 5s or implementing this in Dockerfile: HEALTHCHECK [OPTIONS] CMD <command> or implementing the /health endpoint... its the container that checks itself internally, not an external call.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 10:15:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@matze commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2025):

I am not convinced that supervision functionality (your example is definitely more than a check) should be part of the base image. If you need this, you can use a custom Docker image based on wastebin:latest and add this. I personally use systemd for proper restarts and checks and don't want to be interfered by this.

@matze commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2025): I am not convinced that supervision functionality (your example is definitely more than a check) should be part of the base image. If you need this, you can use a custom Docker image based on `wastebin:latest` and add this. I personally use systemd for proper restarts and checks and don't want to be interfered by this.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 10:15:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ilgigante77 commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2025):

Ok, but this is a standard behaviour of docker. I will create my own image

Il lun 20 gen 2025, 13:23 Matthias Vogelgesang @.***>
ha scritto:

I am not convinced that supervision functionality (your example is
definitely more than a check) should be part of the base image. If you need
this, you can use a custom Docker image based on wastebin:latest and add
this. I personally use systemd for proper restarts and checks and don't
want to be interfered by this.

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/matze/wastebin/issues/82#issuecomment-2602288088, or
unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKCQNHPSHLOYDP3NIVJ2JK32LTTFLAVCNFSM6AAAAABSU6CKUGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMMBSGI4DQMBYHA
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
@.***>

@ilgigante77 commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2025): Ok, but this is a standard behaviour of docker. I will create my own image Il lun 20 gen 2025, 13:23 Matthias Vogelgesang ***@***.***> ha scritto: > I am not convinced that supervision functionality (your example is > definitely more than a check) should be part of the base image. If you need > this, you can use a custom Docker image based on wastebin:latest and add > this. I personally use systemd for proper restarts and checks and don't > want to be interfered by this. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/matze/wastebin/issues/82#issuecomment-2602288088>, or > unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKCQNHPSHLOYDP3NIVJ2JK32LTTFLAVCNFSM6AAAAABSU6CKUGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMMBSGI4DQMBYHA> > . > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: > ***@***.***> >

kerem commented

2026-02-27 10:15:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@matze commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2025):

Sorry, I don't follow. How is container technology related to how things are run inside the container? Do you have some reading material?

@matze commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2025): Sorry, I don't follow. How is container technology related to how things are run inside the container? Do you have some reading material?

kerem referenced this issue

2026-02-27 10:15:53 +03:00

[PR #52] [MERGED] Add stdin paste example to README #132