starred/vaultwarden

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden.git synced 2026-04-25 17:25:57 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #1134] Push new docker image to support SSO #802

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-03 02:03:22 +03:00 by kerem · 11 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-03 02:03:22 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @yggdrasil-tynor on GitHub (Sep 11, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/issues/1134

Was released 2 days ago: https://github.com/bitwarden/web/releases/tag/v2.16.0

Originally created by @yggdrasil-tynor on GitHub (Sep 11, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/issues/1134 Was released 2 days ago: https://github.com/bitwarden/web/releases/tag/v2.16.0

kerem

2026-03-03 02:03:22 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
better for forum
label

kerem commented

2026-03-03 02:03:23 +03:00

Author

Owner

@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2020):

SSO Will not work without server-side changes.
We probably have to implement a lot of code to support this.
Only updating the web-vault will not do the trick.

@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2020): SSO Will not work without server-side changes. We probably have to implement a lot of code to support this. Only updating the web-vault will not do the trick.

kerem commented

2026-03-03 02:03:23 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Crow-Control commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2020):

SSO Will not work without server-side changes.
We probably have to implement a lot of code to support this.
Only updating the web-vault will not do the trick.

I've looked into it, the server-side changes are actually quite minimal. Their implementation is basically comparable to a reverse proxy in front of bitwarden (but integrated), it does not replace the normal login and master-password requirements.

Some more info:
https://github.com/bitwarden/server/commits/fd6b10df564778ea73c00e8dcecc00aa74c5eb7d/src/Core/Enums/SsoType.cs
https://bitwarden.com/help/article/getting-started-with-sso/

@Crow-Control commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2020): > SSO Will not work without server-side changes. > We probably have to implement a lot of code to support this. > Only updating the web-vault will not do the trick. I've looked into it, the server-side changes are actually quite minimal. Their implementation is basically comparable to a reverse proxy in front of bitwarden (but integrated), it does not replace the normal login and master-password requirements. Some more info: https://github.com/bitwarden/server/commits/fd6b10df564778ea73c00e8dcecc00aa74c5eb7d/src/Core/Enums/SsoType.cs https://bitwarden.com/help/article/getting-started-with-sso/

kerem commented

2026-03-03 02:03:24 +03:00

Author

Owner

@xdubx commented on GitHub (Sep 14, 2020):

It would play into my hands if that were to be implemented. But I can only support the statement of Ornias1993.

@xdubx commented on GitHub (Sep 14, 2020): It would play into my hands if that were to be implemented. But I can only support the statement of Ornias1993.

kerem commented

2026-03-03 02:03:24 +03:00

Author

Owner

@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Sep 14, 2020):

Everyone can create a PR to implement this 😉.
Would be nice to have this, including all lot of other stuff.
When someone has time to implement this it will probably be pushed and merged.

@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Sep 14, 2020): Everyone can create a PR to implement this 😉. Would be nice to have this, including all lot of other stuff. When someone has time to implement this it will probably be pushed and merged.

kerem commented

2026-03-03 02:03:24 +03:00

Author

Owner

@littlebigmedia commented on GitHub (Oct 8, 2020):

This would be huge if added correctly!

@littlebigmedia commented on GitHub (Oct 8, 2020): This would be huge if added correctly!

kerem commented

2026-03-03 02:03:24 +03:00

Author

Owner

@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Oct 8, 2020):

To keep the issue tracker more focused, I'm closing this issue in favor of the meta issue at #246

@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Oct 8, 2020): To keep the issue tracker more focused, I'm closing this issue in favor of the meta issue at #246

kerem commented

2026-03-03 02:03:24 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Crow-Control commented on GitHub (Oct 8, 2020):

@BlackDex Besides the fact that it has nothing to do with a docker image needing to be pushed.

@Crow-Control commented on GitHub (Oct 8, 2020): @BlackDex Besides the fact that it has nothing to do with a docker image needing to be pushed.

kerem commented

2026-03-03 02:03:24 +03:00

Author

Owner

@pinpox commented on GitHub (Jul 22, 2021):

I'd like to implement this, but would need a bit of guidance since I've not worked on valtwarden yet. @Ornias1993 What/where would be a good starting point for the changes you mentioned? Would be great to get any pointers!

@pinpox commented on GitHub (Jul 22, 2021): I'd like to implement this, but would need a bit of guidance since I've not worked on valtwarden yet. @Ornias1993 What/where would be a good starting point for the changes you mentioned? Would be great to get any pointers!

kerem commented

2026-03-03 02:03:24 +03:00

Author

Owner

@jiwanovski87 commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2021):

@pinpox Have you already started with the implementation?

@jiwanovski87 commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2021): @pinpox Have you already started with the implementation?

kerem commented

2026-03-03 02:03:24 +03:00

Author

Owner

@pinpox commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2021):

@jiwanovski87 There has been some work here: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/pull/1955

@pinpox commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2021): @jiwanovski87 There has been some work here: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/pull/1955

kerem commented

2026-03-03 02:03:24 +03:00

Author

Owner

@BloodyIron commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2023):

Can we get SAML?

@BloodyIron commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2023): Can we get SAML?