starred/vaultwarden

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden.git synced 2026-04-26 09:46:00 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #596] Backup option in the admin panel not available in Docker #396

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-03 01:28:42 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-03 01:28:42 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @Skaronator on GitHub (Aug 31, 2019).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/issues/596

Hi!

Just saw in the changelog that you can now backup the SQLite Database in the admin web interface but saidly it looks like that option isn't available for me.

Looks like this check results in a false:
github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs@026f9da035/src/api/admin.rs (L39-L41)

since sqlite isn't available in the container:
github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs@469318bcbd/docker/amd64/sqlite/Dockerfile (L32-L35)

I tried the following docker images:

bitwardenrs/server:alpine
bitwardenrs/server:latest

Currently running version 1.10.0-469318bc

Originally created by @Skaronator on GitHub (Aug 31, 2019). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/issues/596 Hi! Just saw in the changelog that you can now backup the SQLite Database in the admin web interface but saidly it looks like that option isn't available for me. ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2886913/64064124-428a4380-cbfe-11e9-85b6-4cbaad9384af.png) Looks like this check results in a `false`: https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/blob/026f9da035dcbf5ff12387600162841f94b47154/src/api/admin.rs#L39-L41 since sqlite isn't available in the container: https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/blob/469318bcbdca68ca58735f7cc58dd1e943e4da1e/docker/amd64/sqlite/Dockerfile#L32-L35 I tried the following docker images: - bitwardenrs/server:alpine - bitwardenrs/server:latest Currently running version 1.10.0-469318bc

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-03 01:28:43 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-03 01:28:43 +03:00

Author

Owner

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 4, 2019):

Those lines you linked are for the build container, the final image never had sqlite bundled in. The PR #475 was merged with the understanding that there will be better option than running external command once the sqlite 3.27 becomes more common.

So right now, you can build your own version of the image with sqlite bundled in. Or we can discuss bundling in another binary or we can see if newer sqlite library and built-in backup functionality would be an option now. (the latest would be the ideal solution IMO)

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 4, 2019): Those lines you linked are for the build container, the final image never had sqlite bundled in. The PR #475 was merged with the understanding that there will be better option than running external command once the sqlite `3.27` becomes more common. So right now, you can build your own version of the image with sqlite bundled in. Or we can discuss bundling in another binary or we can see if newer sqlite library and built-in backup functionality would be an option now. (the latest would be the ideal solution IMO)

kerem commented

2026-03-03 01:28:43 +03:00

Author

Owner

@TheMardy commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2019):

@mprasil
I'm afraid we will have to wait for a few more months for the ideal solution.
We will need a libsqlite-sys 0.17 crate (that version uses SQLite 3.27 for VACUUM INTO support)
After that is out, we have to wait for Diesel to support it as libsqlite-sys 0.17 has a few breaking changes.

@TheMardy commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2019): @mprasil I'm afraid we will have to wait for a few more months for the ideal solution. We will need a libsqlite-sys 0.17 crate (that version uses SQLite 3.27 for `VACUUM INTO` support) After that is out, we have to wait for Diesel to support it as libsqlite-sys 0.17 has a few breaking changes.

kerem commented

2026-03-03 01:28:44 +03:00

Author

Owner

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2019):

I've created PR #638 to use the binary in the meantime.

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2019): I've created PR #638 to use the binary in the meantime.

kerem commented

2026-03-03 01:28:44 +03:00

Author

Owner

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2019):

The latest images should have sqlite bundled in and the backup option should be present in the admin interface. I'm going to resolve this.

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2019): The latest images should have sqlite bundled in and the backup option should be present in the admin interface. I'm going to resolve this.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-03 08:52:48 +03:00

[PR #396] [CLOSED] [WIP] Simple LDAP sync #2730

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-03 08:52:51 +03:00

[PR #455] [MERGED] Add new endpoint for retrieving all users #2738