[GH-ISSUE #528] Support for Subpaths #335

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-03 01:28:06 +03:00 by kerem · 1 comment

kerem commented

2026-03-03 01:28:06 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @kaygdotorg on GitHub (Jul 11, 2019).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/issues/528

Is it possible to run Bitwarden in a reverse proxy setup on a subpath instead of a subdomain?

I've searched around and have only found this: https://github.com/bitwarden/server/issues/277
Is it not a supported scenario for bitwarden_rs too?

Originally created by @kaygdotorg on GitHub (Jul 11, 2019). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/issues/528 Is it possible to run Bitwarden in a reverse proxy setup on a subpath instead of a subdomain? I've searched around and have only found this: https://github.com/bitwarden/server/issues/277 Is it not a supported scenario for bitwarden_rs too?

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-03 01:28:06 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-03 01:28:07 +03:00

Author

Owner

@dani-garcia commented on GitHub (Jul 11, 2019):

This isn't a supported feature, but it can be made to work with some changes both to the web vault and the server code. That does mean recompiling the server and the web vault, so I would recommend using a subdomain.

There are some old patches available here: https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/issues/241#issuecomment-436376497.

@dani-garcia commented on GitHub (Jul 11, 2019): This isn't a supported feature, but it can be made to work with some changes both to the web vault and the server code. That does mean recompiling the server and the web vault, so I would recommend using a subdomain. There are some old patches available here: https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/issues/241#issuecomment-436376497.