[GH-ISSUE #467] Any ETA on upgrading Web Vault to 2.10.0? #288

Closed
opened 2026-03-03 01:27:38 +03:00 by kerem · 5 comments
Owner

Originally created by @d19dotca on GitHub (Apr 26, 2019).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/issues/467

Hello,

Was just curious is there was any ETA on issuing a recent release of Bitwarden_RS using the latest Bitwarden Web Vault version 2.10.0. Right now it seems the latest in Bitwarden_RS is 2.9.0. As somebody with a relatively large vault (about 600 items, not sure if that's really considered "large" or not), I think people like myself will benefit from the update to web vault 2.10.0 which had a release note stating "Page item listing for better performance on large vaults".

Originally created by @d19dotca on GitHub (Apr 26, 2019). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/issues/467 Hello, Was just curious is there was any ETA on issuing a recent release of Bitwarden_RS using the latest Bitwarden Web Vault version 2.10.0. Right now it seems the latest in Bitwarden_RS is 2.9.0. As somebody with a relatively large vault (about 600 items, not sure if that's really considered "large" or not), I think people like myself will benefit from the update to web vault 2.10.0 which had a release note stating "Page item listing for better performance on large vaults".
kerem closed this issue 2026-03-03 01:27:38 +03:00
Author
Owner

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Apr 26, 2019):

Hi @dustindauncey the mprasil/bitwarden image does have 2.10.0 version of Vault bundled in. Are you sure you're really using the latest version of the image?

<!-- gh-comment-id:487154728 --> @mprasil commented on GitHub (Apr 26, 2019): Hi @dustindauncey the `mprasil/bitwarden` image does have `2.10.0` version of Vault bundled in. Are you sure you're really using the latest version of the image?
Author
Owner

@d19dotca commented on GitHub (Apr 26, 2019):

I am running 1.8.0-alpine and it contains 2.9.0 web vault. I prefer to generally stick to versioned tags rather than using "latest" tag for production stability reasons.

<!-- gh-comment-id:487181266 --> @d19dotca commented on GitHub (Apr 26, 2019): I am running 1.8.0-alpine and it contains 2.9.0 web vault. I prefer to generally stick to versioned tags rather than using "latest" tag for production stability reasons.
Author
Owner

@d19dotca commented on GitHub (Apr 26, 2019):

The latest release from this repository is 1.8.0 as well.

<!-- gh-comment-id:487181441 --> @d19dotca commented on GitHub (Apr 26, 2019): The latest release from this repository is 1.8.0 as well.
Author
Owner

@dani-garcia commented on GitHub (Apr 26, 2019):

I'll probably get a new release going this weekend now that the new Duo integration is working fine.

<!-- gh-comment-id:487185761 --> @dani-garcia commented on GitHub (Apr 26, 2019): I'll probably get a new release going this weekend now that the new Duo integration is working fine.
Author
Owner

@dani-garcia commented on GitHub (Apr 27, 2019):

The new release is published now, the images will be built in a couple of hours.

<!-- gh-comment-id:487308666 --> @dani-garcia commented on GitHub (Apr 27, 2019): The new release is published now, the images will be built in a couple of hours.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/vaultwarden#288
No description provided.