mirror of
https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden.git
synced 2026-04-26 01:35:54 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #441] [Question] LTS & how are Bitwarden updates handled? #262
Labels
No labels
SSO
Third party
better for forum
bug
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
future Vault
future Vault
future Vault
good first issue
help wanted
low priority
notes
pull-request
question
troubleshooting
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/vaultwarden#262
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @advename on GitHub (Mar 25, 2019).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/issues/441
I'm thinking about implementing this rust version for our company because all our servers use ZFS as system partition (not supported by official Bitwarden) and changing to Ext4 is currently not an option.
I'm wondering how the is the LTS looking for this project? And how are bitwarden updates handled? Do they need to be manually implemented into this project or are updates non dependant from Bitwarden_rs?
@dani-garcia commented on GitHub (Mar 25, 2019):
We don't offer any long term support guaranteees because I don't have the bandwidth to maintain multiple versions, but I try to keep compatibility in mind and make sure that the upgrade path from one version to the next is as simple as possible, so it should be easy to keep up to date using the latest release.
We don't have automatic server updates or any kind of update notifications, but you can subscribe to the GitHub releases to be kept up-to-date.
As far as the client updates, most of them don't have breaking changes, so they should work without any modifications. If they add any new functionality or they change some API calls, then there is a chance that it would require a server update to work. This doesn't happen very often, and I try to keep up with the upstream changes to make sure that the project isn't left too far behind, but it's not perfect.
@mprasil commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2019):
I think this was answered and can be closed now. Feel free to reopen if you have further questions regarding this.