[GH-ISSUE #4451] [wiki] non-exists nginx version on wiki #1890

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-03 02:13:09 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-03 02:13:09 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @iDoka on GitHub (Mar 25, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/issues/4451

This wiki page mentioned

Nginx - v1.29.0+

Meanwhile, based on http://nginx.org/en/download.html the latest stable version of nginx is 1.24.0

Originally created by @iDoka on GitHub (Mar 25, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/issues/4451 [This wiki page](https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/wiki/Proxy-examples) mentioned ``` Nginx - v1.29.0+ ``` Meanwhile, based on http://nginx.org/en/download.html the latest stable version of nginx is **1.24.0**

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-03 02:13:10 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-03 02:13:10 +03:00

Author

Owner

@stefan0xC commented on GitHub (Mar 25, 2024):

The version refers to the vaultwarden version (1.29.0 or later)

@stefan0xC commented on GitHub (Mar 25, 2024): The version refers to the vaultwarden version ([1.29.0](https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/releases/tag/1.29.0) or later)

kerem commented

2026-03-03 02:13:10 +03:00

Author

Owner

@iDoka commented on GitHub (Mar 25, 2024):

@stefan0xC string before defined as

Caddy 2.x

on the same wiki page.

AFAIK v2.x of vaultwarden doesn't exists as well 🤷‍♂️

@iDoka commented on GitHub (Mar 25, 2024): @stefan0xC string before defined as ``` Caddy 2.x ``` on the same wiki page. AFAIK v2.x of vaultwarden doesn't exists as well 🤷‍♂️

kerem commented

2026-03-03 02:13:10 +03:00

Author

Owner

@stefan0xC commented on GitHub (Mar 25, 2024):

But there is a 2.x of Caddy https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/releases

@stefan0xC commented on GitHub (Mar 25, 2024): But there is a 2.x of Caddy https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/releases

kerem commented

2026-03-03 02:13:10 +03:00

Author

Owner

@stefan0xC commented on GitHub (Mar 25, 2024):

But I agree that the vaultwarden version does not need to be there as we only support the current release anyway so the old configurations don't need to be listed.

@stefan0xC commented on GitHub (Mar 25, 2024): But I agree that the vaultwarden version does not need to be there as we only support the current release anyway so the old configurations don't need to be listed.